916-234-9398

you people are pathetic and so lonely that u seek companionship from a keyboard, wow, get a life people, Really !?...Ur best idea, came from anger at a computer generated telephone call, and to get on here and talk stupidity was it ?...LOLOLOLOL..People are either Leaders or Followers...Why dont all of U hold hands, and get in line together behind the leaders, before u get left behind again...FKN LOSERS...Suggestion..go get an Ice Cream...and then Go Get Laid... there are your first 2 tasks of trying to get out of ur rut of believing life should have been better for you..dont get your hopes too hi,,once a loser has reached soap opera level,they are pretty much Doomed..But being a leader, it is in my nature to try to help you...and I think the Ice Cream and the Sex are two things that have been gone for too long  obviously, if this is where you have ended up...Hell, here is a better Idea..combine the two..Happy Licks !!

Dear Doctor,

Did you not just sit down at a keyboard and rant?      Run out of ice cream?       Recognize yourself in the mirror as one of life's pathetic losers now?

Some lady (who called my cell) set up an appt. for myself to get a quote on carpet cleaning (because 9.95 a room is too good to be true, right?) Well when the guy showed up I was in the bathroom getting ready for a shower, my elderly mom came knocking on the door saying that some guy wants $135 for just my living room to be cleaned!! When I came out of the bathroom (YES this all happened in a matter of minutes!!!) this guy was moving around my furniture to start steam cleaning! (I hadn't even shook his hand, I was in shock, I didn't agree to pay him anything!!) I started to explain I thought this was for just an estimate and he starts yelling at me (infront of my six yr old!) calling me a liar and a lying *****! I had to ask him to leave my home and call the cops. AKA NIGHTMARE! LESSON LEARNED. I hope that POS never gets any good future business.

I already did my post but I found a similar story to mine:

"Set up appointment with Carpet tile furniture cleaning experts to come to my home and clean my carpet. This crazy man comes and insults my husband and then says the $9.99 what i was quoted meant they start as low as $9.99 depending on what has to be done. I said to him this is not what a lady name Ann told me. He told me it would cost $95.00 to clean 2 rooms. Very unprofessional, it s amazing how these people continue to stay in business. Im talking to him on my husbands cell phone, he interupts me and throws the floor down on the floor. In my home this person is acting like this. Then he tells my husband he will kick his *** if he comes outside. I'm alerting every bureau i know, Federal Commission dept, local police dept and who ever else."

This guy is a freak do not set up an appt. with this company!!!

Everyone goto wordpress.com cleaning experts  jeff harris kevin calvin the truth about are your carpets dirty
Put the city you live in please. Wordpress.com

If anybody showed up at my house and acted like that guy did I would have to subdue him and call the hospital me probably has mental issues
And can't control himself. Or this guy has a serious drug habit and really can t control himself. Then if I found he stole from us full prosecution.
But the things I've read about this guy is wow and he still alive. As much bs this guy does I figure somebody ll have [***] him up by now.
So lets set him up. 9162349398.let the pounding begin .

It serious sounds like the dr him self has a issue
Screaming and yelling over a computer
Might the dr be the person we re talking about and again
Back to anger issues steeming from a drug habit.
This also could be anger outburts from frustration or a failing business. So you figure out what's the situation with the sceaming and yelling. And report back to us doc we re dying to hear your next issue. Kevin or jeff or ray who ever you are today. Hahahahahaha

Question: What are the elements of a defamation claim?

Answer: The party making a defamation claim (plaintiff) must ordinarily prove four elements:
1.a publication to one other than the person defamed;
2.a false statement of fact;
3.that is understood as

a. being of and concerning the plaintiff; and
b. tending to harm the reputation of plaintiff.
4.If the plaintiff is a public figure, he or she must also prove actual malice.

Question: What are the elements of a defamation claim?

Answer: The party making a defamation claim (plaintiff) must ordinarily prove four elements:
1.a publication to one other than the person defamed;
2.a false statement of fact;
3.that is understood as

a. being of and concerning the plaintiff; and
b. tending to harm the reputation of plaintiff.
4.If the plaintiff is a public figure, he or she must also prove actual malice.
Question: Can an opinion be defamatory?

Answer: No ? but merely labeling a statement as your "opinion" does not make it so. Courts look at whether a reasonable reader or listener could understand the statement as asserting a statement of verifiable fact. (A verifiable fact is one capable of being proven true or false.) This is determined in light of the context of the statement. A few courts have said that statements made in the context of an Internet bulletin board or chat room are highly likely to be opinions or hyperbole, but they do look at the remark in context to see if it's likely to be seen as a true, even if controversial, opinion ("I really hate George Lucas' new movie") rather than an assertion of fact dressed up as an opinion ("It's my opinion that Trinity is the hacker who broke into the IRS database

Question: What is libel?

Answer: Libel is a false statement of fact expressed in a fixed medium, usually writing but also a picture, sign, or electronic broadcast. See What are the elements of a defamation claim?
Question: What is libel per se?

Answer: When libel is clear on its face, without the need for any explanatory matter, it is called libel per se. The following are often found to be libelous per se:

A statement that falsely:
• Charges any person with crime, or with having been indicted, convicted, or punished for crime;
• Imputes in him the present existence of an infectious, contagious, or loathsome disease;
• Tends directly to injure him in respect to his office, profession, trade or business, either by imputing to him general disqualification in those respects that the office or other occupation peculiarly requires, or by imputing something with reference to his office, profession, trade, or business that has a natural tendency to lessen its profits;
• Imputes to him impotence or a want of chastity.
Of course, context can still matter. If you respond to a post you don't like by beginning "Jane, you ignorant [***]," it may imply a want of chastity on Jane's part. But you have a good chance of convincing a court this was mere hyperbole and pop cultural reference, not a false statement of fact. Question: What is the "publication" of a defamatory statement?

Answer: Publication is the dissemination of the defamatory statement to any person other than the person about whom the statement is written or spoken. Question: May someone other than the person who originally made the defamatory statement be legally liable in defamation?

Answer: One who "publishes" a defamatory statement may be liable. However, 47 U.S.C. sec. 230 says that online service providers are not publishers of content posted by their users. Section 230 gives most ISPs and message board hosts the discretion to keep postings or delete them, whichever they prefer, in response to claims by others that a posting is defamatory or libelous. Most ISPs and message board hosts also post terms of service that give them the right to delete or not delete messages as they see fit and such terms have generally been held to be enforceable under law.
Question: What is Malice or "Actual Malice"?

Answer: Malice is often defined as, "the intent, without justification or excuse, to commit a wrongful act." It is the conscious, intentional wrongdoing with the intent of doing harm to do the victim. In many civil cases, a finding that a defendant acted with malice will often open the door to liability or increased damages, such as punitive damages. "Actual malice" is a legal term of art that is mainly relevant to defamaton claims. "Actual Malice" is found to be present when a false statement is published with either a) actual knowledge of its falsity or b) reckless disregard for its falsity-- a "should have known" standard. One cannot be held liable for publishing untrue statements about public figures (or companies) without being found to have acted with "actual malice"

Question: What is a "false light" claim?

Answer: Some states allow people to sue for damages that arise when others place them in a false light. Information presented in a "false light" is portrayed as factual, but creates a false impression about the plaintiff (i.e., a photograph of plaintiffs in an article about sexual abuse, because it creates the impression that the depicted persons are victims of sexual abuse). False light claims are subject to the constitutional protections discussed above.



Question: What is a SLAPP suit?

Answer: SLAPP stands for Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation, or lawsuits aimed at squelching speech and involvement in government. Many states, including California, have anti-SLAPP statutes allowing one who has been targeted by a SLAPP to sue back.

Online, SLAPP suits typically involve a person who has posted anonymous criticisms of a corporation or public figure on the Internet. The target of the criticism then files a lawsuit so they can issue a subpoena to the Web site or Internet Service Provider (ISP) involved and thereby discover the identity of their anonymous critic. Many SLAPPers stop after discovering their critic's identity, using the tactic to intimidate or silence online speakers even though they were engaging in protected expression under the First Amendment.




Question: What are the elements of a defamation claim?

Answer: The party making a defamation claim (plaintiff) must ordinarily prove four elements:
1.a publication to one other than the person defamed;
2.a false statement of fact;
3.that is understood as

a. being of and concerning the plaintiff; and
b. tending to harm the reputation of plaintiff.
4.If the plaintiff is a public figure, he or she must also prove actual malice.




Question: What are the privacy torts?

Answer: Much privacy law is state law, and may differ from state to state. As general categories, states may recognize interests in:


• unreasonable intrusion upon the seclusion of another;

• appropriation of the other's name or likeness;

• unreasonable publicity given to the other's private life; and

• publicity that unreasonably places the other in a false light before the public.
(from the Second Restatement of Torts, ? 652A) Question: Can I be sued for publishing somebody else's private facts?

Answer: Some jurisdictions allow lawsuits for the publication of private facts. In California, for example, the elements are (1) public disclosure; (2) of a private fact; (3) that is offensive to a reasonable person; and (4) which is not a legitimate matter of public concern. Publication on a blog would generally be considered public disclosure. However, if a private fact is deemed "newsworthy," it may be legal to print it even if it might be considered "offensive to a reasonable person."



Question: What is "intrusion into seclusion"?

Answer: Intrusion into seclusion occurs when you intrude upon the solitude or seclusion of another person or his private affairs or concerns, if the intrusion would be highly offensive to a reasonable person. It generally comes up in the context of paparazzi photographing celebrities, but covers any reasonable expectation of privacy that is intruded upon. If the person intruded upon gave you consent to do it - i.e., gave you permission to take his picture or write about him - then you have a defense against this claim. Interception of an electronic communication (i.e., an email or IM chat) can raise additional legal issues, such as federal wiretap laws.


Question: What is a statement of verifiable fact?

Answer: A statement of verifiable fact is a statement that conveys a provably false factual assertion, such as someone has committed murder or has cheated on his spouse. To illustrate this point, consider the following excerpt from a court (Vogel v. Felice) considering the alleged defamatory statement that plaintiffs were the top-ranking 'Dumb [***]' on defendant's list of "Top Ten Dumb [***]":



A statement that the plaintiff is a "Dumb Ass," even first among "Dumb [***]," communicates no factual proposition susceptible of proof or refutation. It is true that "dumb" by itself can convey the relatively concrete meaning "lacking in intelligence." Even so, depending on context, it may convey a lack less of objectively assayable mental function than of such imponderable and debatable virtues as judgment or wisdom. Here defendant did not use "dumb" in isolation, but as part of the idiomatic phrase, "dumb ass." When applied to a whole human being, the term "ass" is a general expression of contempt essentially devoid of factual content. Adding the word "dumb" merely converts "contemptible person" to "contemptible fool." Plaintiffs were justifiably insulted by this epithet, but they failed entirely to show how it could be found to convey a provable factual proposition. ... If the meaning conveyed cannot by its nature be proved false, it cannot support a libel claim.

This California case also rejected a claim that the defendant linked the plaintiffs' names to certain web addresses with objectionable addresses (i.e. www.satan.com), noting "merely linking a plaintiff's name to the word "satan" conveys nothing more than the author's opinion that there is something devilish or evil about the plaintiff."



Question: What is cyberstalking?

Answer: It has been defined as the use of information and communications technology, particularly the Internet, by an individual or group of individuals, to harass another individual, group of individuals, or organization. The behavior includes false accusations, monitoring, the transmission of threats, identity theft, damage to data or equipment, the solicitation of minors for sexual purposes, and gathering information for harassment purposes. The harassment must be such that a reasonable person, in possession of the same information, would regard it as sufficient to cause another reasonable person distress.





The law of defamation balances two important, and sometimes competing, rights: the right to engage in free speech and the right to be free from untrue attacks on reputation. In practice, the filing or even the threat to file a lawsuit for defamation has sometimes been used as a tool to shut down legitimate comments on the Internet.

uestion: What is false light invasion of privacy?

Answer: "False light" is a claim that publicity invades a person's (plaintiff's) privacy by a false statement or representation that "places the plaintiff in a false light that would be highly offensive to a reasonable person."

Question: How does the First Amendment to the Constitution affect defamation?

Answer: The free speech guarantees under the Constitution protect certain speech and commentary. The degree of protection generally depends on whether the person commented about is a private or public figure and whether the statement is regarding a private or public matter. According to the New York Times rule (from the case New York Times v. Sullivan), when the plaintiff is a public figure and the matter is one of public concern, the plaintiff must prove "malice" or "reckless disregard" on the part of the defendant. If both parties are private individuals, there is less protection for the speech because the plaintiff only needs to prove negligence.


Question: What is disparagement?

Answer: As defined in Black's Law Dictionary (7th ed. 1999), disparagement is "A false and injurious statement that discredits or detracts from the reputation of another's property, product, or business. To recover in tort for disparagement, the plaintiff must prove that the statement caused a third party to take some action resulting in specific pecuniary loss to the plaintiff."

to made an appointment with them. Unfortunately I went through with it even though they were two and a half hours late. It was the worst the worst I mean the worst service I have ever gotten in my life. Yeah when I try calling them back I didn't get a hold of them either for 2 hours after they were late. They show up with a man and his two sons probably the ages of 8 and 14. For a half hour now the man tries to sell me into a $300 job I see no way I don't have that kind of money. This man did not let up for nothing kept going and going and going asking me if I could get the money loaned to me . I was getting very angry and I told the gentleman if you don't stop I'm going to ask you to leave. He says can I ask you a question?  Why would you ask me to leave ? Oh my god I was by myself. I just wanted it done because I now have all my furniture pulled out of my house everything off the floors that I did my self so I went ahead and got the money loaned to me  from a friend .  I paid $110. it just gets worse from here his poor kids were doing the work . Meanwhile the man is complaining to my roommate that his arm hurt he don't feel well so she gives him some ibuprofen and a vitamin C . naturally I had a talk with her later. I have picked several things about my floor in my room now my laptops were sitting on my bed he picks up my office chair in my room and throws it on my bed . He was So lucky nothing broke .   I was steaming. As they're finishing up  I go outside only to see the 14 year old smoking a cigarette he might have been younger but no older than 14.  Shame on this man for allowing his child to smoke. .. I start cooking dinner on my grill and I look over to my right and he's pouring the dirty water out on the side of my house by my trees. I told him not to do that. So now I come back out and he still doing it my friend had to say something to him. That was that. I told him to be sure that the boys got the $10 tip. I called and complained nobody ever got back to me I called again and again and again no one ever got back to me they were supposed to come back out and do my carpet. I don't have time for all this nonsense they were  telling me .  I have yet to report him but I am going to now. Lucky for you that. you canceled because it was the worst.

What part of the country are you in? This guy travels around, and I just wanted to know where he was at know