08702202020

@Wandering
Back again with the same old cr@p.  Why not answer the simple question:

If you know so much and are so wound up about it, why don't you take it to the police?

dont speak too soon!!

HA HA HA HA HA

simple question

how much does moulsdale pay you?

Some very interesting comments deleted .

Moulsdale must be getting stressed !!!

@Wandering
I see that you're still not able to read or comprehend and memory is still patchy.  How can we believe your allegations when you can't even recall something from a few hours ago?.

I have no connection, financial, business or social, with Optical Express, Moulsdale, Optimax, Ambrose, etc, etc. No connection means that I'm a free agent to do what I feel is right.  At the moment that's asking the great campaigner to come out of hiding and explain herself.

As for "don't speak too soon", I won't be holding my breath.  So far you've just been a bag of wind.

I doubt very much whether Moulsdale or any of his cronies had anything to do with deletion of posts this evening, or those of a few days ago.  I suspect that you and your friends have finally tested the patience of the website owner and she has done some cleaning out of her own.  If so, thank you Julia.  Please keep up the good work and expose those using the same IP address to post under multiple aliases.

maybe Moulsdale will be stepping back from allegedly [***]  young female employees into bed ?Whilst his PA covers for him ? ( all alleged according to EX - a comment now deleted from the forum ) how embarrassing is that !!

Must be quite embarrassing for him to know that someone called ' Chang ' wrote on this forum dubbing him the ' jimmy saville of the eye industry '

I wonder how many what seems like real eye witness accounts are going to be removed from the Internet ?

Do I really sound like the kind of person who is going to worry about you two and your payrolled rubbish ?

You can insinuate whatever rubbish you like - clearly this all probably very cringeworthy for Moulsdale - why else would he seem to be paying people like you two losers 9 reading with ineterest/insider/anon) to sit there and be rude to me .'

Why should what seems like legitimate feedback from ex employees get ignored ?

@Wandering
Why don't you change the record? Instead of posting this repetitive drivel.  I don't often agree with IsmellanOErat, but in this case it's spot on.  Optical Express, Optimax and Ultralase all stink equally.  Lets have more people posting so that we get a balanced view on here and one line drivellers like you get drowned out - just as you are trying to do with other points of view here.

If you would back off, I'm sure that more ex-employees would post, but all the time that you spout your drivel, it's not the kind of thread that they wish to be associated with. There is no "right" to post here.  It's at the discretion of the site owner.  If she thinks that we are out of line she will hit the delete button.  You want the voices of ex-employees to be heard? Be quiet and let them.  You want a guarantee of your post not being deleted by the site owner? set one up for yourself.

I've already told you what you sound like and you were not particularly flattered! Can't speak for reading with interest or insider, but I only post on my own account, no connection with Optical Express or any of the businesses mentioned here.

You have a nerve accusing me of insinuating rubbish when you are probably the prime exponent on this site!

You have been exposed as either a moral coward or a liar.  You are also backing off your claims in inserting "alleged", "allegedly", "seems like" and similar disclaimers in almost every post.  Prove me wrong.  Actually do something or shut up.

@Julia
Thank you again for keeping an eye on this thread and cutting out some of the repetitive drivel.

Anon probably works for moulsdale

@Wandering
You said "Anon probably works for moulsdale"

You really must see your GP about that dodgy memory and probably blood pressure as well.  I work for myself.  Which part of "I only post on my own account, no connection with Optical Express or any of the businesses mentioned here" did you not understand?

Must be embarrassing knowing with hindsight that your senior managers were embarrassed at the stigma attached with working for your company .

@Wandering
You need your reading glasses.  You must have clicked on the wrong button.

Which part of "I only post on my own account, no connection with Optical Express or any of the businesses mentioned here" did you not understand?

I bet its embarrassing working for optical  express .

Working for David Moulsdale - a guy who allegedly has got problems keeping himself in his trousers so badly that he has to allegedly take advantage of young women who work for him .

A guy who seems to have lost control of his business too .

Must be embarrassing knowing that some customers have allegedly been so unhappy they have tried to get in touch with him . Must be embarrassing working for someone who can't seem to face up to the reality of complaining customers .


Must be embarrassing trying to deal with customers probably  knowing the company probably  doesnt care. Must give you a lot of job satisfaction knowing that  you have contributed to such a great company in the recession . A company that probably over borrowed from a bank that nearly collapsed to find over expansion and probably  line the pockets of one individual only . David Moulsdale .

@anon Sasha can't update her opticalexpressruinedmylife website because the person who designed that site is the same person who designed and owns the lasereyesupportforum. Since she has fallen out with him Sasha no longer has a graphic designer who will do free/very cheap work for her and if she wants the OE website redesigned she will have to pay the going rate and anyone who knows Sasha will tell you she hates to do that! Still with all the money she has she can certainly afford to pay a graphic designer the going rate. I guess once a market trader always a market trader.

Nothing's changed the last couple of days. Wondering is still talking nonsense and accusing everyone of being an OE employee. I'd imagine the reason Wondering wants to remain anonymous is because Moulsdale probably has a restraining order out on her.

I on the other hand was more than willing to prove I'm not an OE employee by agreeing to Wondering's demands for a meeting. Wondering obviously backed out because if we had meet she wouldn't be able to spout her usual insane drivel about me being an OE employee. As for Wondering being scared to meet me she was demanding a lift home from me two weeks ago - you didn't seem too scared then did you? I told you to put up or shut up and since you failed miserably to put up why don't you shut up. Don't demand to meet people on a public forum and then when I agree back out and try to make out that it was my idea in the first place. People have read the old posts and can see that you are clearly lying - you really aren't the brightest spark are you?

The real question is will Wondering be sad enough to post her obsessive nonsense on Christmas Day? Who am I trying to kid of course she will!

I notice Sasha and her one remaining follower are giving every one of Anon's posts a thumbs down and every single post of Wondering's a thumbs up no matter how nonsensical they are. Sasha you are so predictable, when are you going to poke your head out from under your pile of money? Wears the ground breaking campaign news?

I'm off for a well deserved holiday Friday. Don't worry Wondering I'll be back next year if you haven't been seconded by the crisis mental health team before then.

@Wandering
You need your reading glasses. Or is it post menopausal dry eye?  

Which part of "I only post on my own account, no connection with Optical Express or any of the businesses mentioned here" did you not understand?  Is short term memory a post menopausal symptom as well?

Most people would find it embarassing having been bought off by Optimax and working with Ambrose under a gagging order.

Most people would find it embarassing to threaten to ruin someones business if they didn't pay an exorbitant amount against a no-negligence claim.

Most people would find it embarassing to claim to be the great campaigner who would not sell out for a million pounds, then quietly abandon her campaign, shut down her website and Twitter accounts to work with Ambrose.

Most people would be embarassed to offer misleading legal advice, represent their claim and thereby ruin some peoples chances of appropriate compensation

Most people would be embarassed to raise false hopes in people with serious eye problems and then shamelessly use them to bolster their own claim.

Most people would be embarassed to offer to work for Optical Express as a paid consultant then take the opportunity to get their own back for refusal by working with a major competitor.

Most people would be ashamed of using their influence with Ambrose to reduce the amount of compensation being considered to someone who wanted to act independently of Sasha.

Most people would have the good sense to know that passing on personal data and medical information without that persons specific consent is not on.  Especially someone offering legal advice.

We hear a lot about half a dozen people with serious problems, but nothing about how the great campaigner has actually helped anyone.  Poking her nose in and upsetting consultants, taking consultants time away from the patient who needs it, writing pseudo legal letters that devalue a patients claim - yes.  Actually helping - no.  Helping no-one but herself.


But then the great campaigner is not just anyone.  She will shamelessly use people to her own advantage, vindictively act against them if they don't fall into line etc.  I'm reminded of Kissingers quote about the USA - she doesn't have principles only interests.  That book is going to be a short one!


@reading with interest
Interesting info.  Care to tell me more? DailyGlobe@hmamail.com - valid until 6:00 am Thursday 20th

Sorry I never read all that.
You two are such liars . Probably corrupt to the core.
@ readingwithinterest /anon
I bet its embarrassing working for optical  express .

Working for David Moulsdale - a guy who allegedly has got problems keeping himself in his trousers so badly that he has to allegedly take advantage of young women who work for him .

A guy who seems to have lost control of his business too .

Must be embarrassing knowing that some customers have allegedly been so unhappy they have tried to get in touch with him . Must be embarrassing working for someone who can't seem to face up to the reality of complaining customers .


Must be embarrassing trying to deal with customers probably  knowing the company probably  doesnt care. Must give you a lot of job satisfaction knowing that  you have contributed to such a great company in the recession . A company that probably over borrowed from a bank that nearly collapsed to find over expansion and probably  line the pockets of one individual only.

David moulsdale .
Allegedly David moulsdale uses cocaine ad work functions.

Reading with interest and anon are more than likely David moulsdales employees !!!One of whom swore at me and was abusive online.  All now deleted

- good to know what kinds of organisations our banks are lending money to - isn't it ?

Anon and reading with interest are probably desperately trying to cover for Moulsdale allegedly attempting to bribe sasha rodoy -Through his senior employee -


Now she seems to be a victim of harassment and slander - the indivdus about probably working for optical express .

Optical express has been called the worst performing chain by the which magazine .

Sasha, get a life! More things you can do with all that money and time, like enjoying your golden years!

As for above, they don't work for OE, you can see that yourself.

It's obviously Moulsdale on here!!!!! If it isn't Moulsdale and his gang subverting this thread I will eat my own nose!!!!! Da da dadadadadaaaaaaa

Seriously, you think a CEO of a big corporation would waste his time with you Sasha? Or even his staff? Your not that important. About time you grow old gracefully, and perhaps take advice from others, you are interfering in peoples legal matters, and negatively affecting their cases. You should be ashamed.

I think Moulsdale loves trying to cover up the disgusting and soulless individual he is.

Obviously trying to cover for how much of a disgusting pervert he probably is  by allegedly trying to cover up how many young employed  women he's been trying to jump on at optical express and allegedly trying to get his PA to cover for him .
( according to EX - a comment now deleted )

Then Probably having comments that ex employees make deleted from the Internet .
Trying to cover up his bribing problems like he is allegedly covering up his pervert problems ? Probably ......

Someone commented here calling him the ' jimmy saville of the eye world ' ( Chang )

I think he's a lying little disgusting soulless desperate pervert of a failing businessman - who is probably on drugs .  I think  he's capable of doing anything to cover up all of his bad moves and immoral business practices .
I think he is rotten to the core .