01516680386
Report a phone call from 01516680386 and help to identify who and why is calling from this number.
- Paul T| 45 repliesIf there are any SIPP investors still out there on here let me know please. ..why is it important..?
Well C O was 300 + for 10 million meaning there's another 240 million and 4700 people out there.. - maybe replies to Paul T| 4 repliesyou should put out a wider advert? or go on to other forums? could be that all investors are not aware of this forum like we are?
where does the 240 million come from? getting a little confused here - Anyone replies to maybe| 2 repliesnoticed recently formed companies for each of storage sites..
Recent posts on Careys blog asking for info. - craig replies to Paul T| 1 replyi am still here Paul, how are you?i am in the process of sending all my information to Len Fenton,Sean Hughes and .Shari
- Collectives replies to Paul T| 37 repliesDon't the CO investors have a case for the FCA to take up this investment as an unregulated collective? The management of the investments (Haha) is outwith the investors' control and clearly beyond the control of the muppets at Imperial. Don't SIPP victims have recourse via the long-suffering FSCS paid for by proper advisers?
- link replies to Anyone| 1 replyto Careys blog please
- PLEASE BE CAREFUL replies to Collectives| 36 repliesThe answer to your first question is.........No!. As i have said if you want action then contact the or.
- ? replies to PLEASE BE CAREFULare you Brian Downs?
- Paul T replies to maybe250 million went into SF according to TW
- Link to Careys replies to link
- Paul T replies to craigCheers Craig..good to hear it..
- Collectives replies to PLEASE BE CAREFUL| 34 repliesWhy not? There will be no compensation, but the FCA should look at this. Their website clearly states " We are taking direct action against several firms and advisers involved in the sale of UCIS to members of the general public".
Are you suggesting this is not a UCIS, just as Store First claim?
The OR has nothing to do with the SIPP investors. Shouldn't the OR act without more having to complain, there is enough evidence of widescale malpractice here. - Paul T replies to CollectivesYou're right..the O R has nothing to do with the SIPPS ...yet...which is why the media attention of late has been sipp related and let's see what comes of this...
No advisers involved in C O.
The 2 are being dealt with completely differently as they have to be.. - PLEASE BE CAREFUL replies to Collectives| 32 repliesYou are being too kind when you describe the situation as malpractice it was nothing less than large scale organised theft.
- Totally replies to PLEASE BE CAREFULAgree, and how this man can present himself as a successful Richard Branson type beggars belief. He's just a low life crook.
- But replies to PLEASE BE CAREFUL| 30 repliesA devious crook!
And will 100% come out smelling of roses.
For the time being! The legal route may not always be the best or most efficient.
Wonder if he got that burglar alarm working yet??? - Sometimes replies to But| 29 repliesPoor tricked investors break in to his house and attack him infront of his kids
- Please be careful replies to Sometimes| 28 repliesI am on the side of the members 100per cent but that comment is totally unacceptable and in spite of what has happened to the members should never enter anyone's head.
- Its replies to Please be careful| 27 repliesWhat happen to him a few years ago..
- Yes replies to Its| 26 repliesalso was took to court over insurance fraud charges but had his uncle take the blame for that. Wonder who's lined up for this one. Hear his uncle is doing OK in Thailand and the company 'which suffered badly from the exposure ' is now doing pretty well. Just hope the authorities don't xxck up this time.
Submit a comment about 01516680386 phone number: