01618502123

Hi There I have got an interview shortly with barry Costello-Monelle so I know where he will be
if you are interested?

I am the really Barry.

Is this what this site is about - character assassination?

Below is a link to the report about me in the Law Society Gazette.

http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/gazette-in-practi ... ary-tribunal-70

Below is that report.

Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal
Thursday 29 March 2007
Decisions



Decisions filed recently with the Law Society (which may be subject to appeal) include:



Barry Luke Damian Young

Application 9415-2006;

Admitted 1994;

Hearing 19 October 2006;

Reasons 22 November 2006
________________________________________
The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) ordered that the respondent, of 412 Dream Hills, Los Altos, Orihuela Costa, Alicante 03189 (formerly of Eastcliff House, 5 Eastcliff, Preston, Lancashire PR1 3JE), should be struck off the roll. The allegations against the respondent, all of which he admitted, were that he had been guilty of unbefitting conduct, in that between May 2005 and July 2005 he had failed to act in the best interest of his clients by going to Spain and leaving his practice without an appropriately qualified supervisor in charge of his practice, in breach of practice rule 1 of the Solicitors Practice Rules 1990; that he had attempted to mislead the Law Society’s investigator by stating that he had attended his practice and supervised staff, despite being in Spain between May 2005 and July 2005, in breach of practice rule 1; that he had failed to supervise properly, or at all, non-qualified staff engaged on his business in relation to conveyancing work, in breach of practice rule 13; that on or about 25 July he had abandoned his practice and his clients following his exclusion from his office premises, in breach of practice rule 1; that he had overcharged clients by claiming as a disbursement for local searches an amount in excess of that charged to the firm by the company carrying out searches, in breach of practice rules 1 and 15; that he had failed to avoid conflicts of interest in conveyancing, property selling and mortgage-related services, in breach of practice rule 6; that he had failed to comply with the Solicitors Introduction and Referral Code 1990, including a failure to maintain a record of agreements for the introduction of work and disclose to clients commission fees paid to referral companies, in breach of practice rules 1 and 3; that he had failed to act with independence or integrity in his representation of Mrs B, and by drafting an agreement between Mrs B and his brother without advising Mrs B either to seek or consider seeking independent legal representation and/or advice, in breach of practice rule 1. It was further alleged that the respondent had failed to comply with the Solicitors Accounts Rules 1998 in each of the following particulars, namely: that he had failed to keep proper accounting records, in breach of rule 32; that he had failed to ensure compliance with the rules, in breach of rule 6; that he had failed on discovery to remedy a shortage of money in client accounts, in breach of rule 7(1); that he had improperly withdrawn client money from his designated client account, in breach of rule 22; that he had failed to comply with rule 23 with regard to arrangements for the withdrawal of client account monies; and that he had failed to deliver or alternatively had delayed in delivering to the Law Society accountant’s reports for the periods ending 31 March 2004, 30 September 2004 and 31 March 2005, contrary to section 34 of the Solicitors Act 1974 and the rules made thereunder.

The SDT noted that dishonesty had not been alleged against the respondent, but he had admitted a raft of allegations relating to a catalogue of failure on his part to conduct himself properly as a solicitor.


Where in the above report does it say that I have done anything dishonest or illegal?

Moving on, the entry re the drugs is blatant lies. This is defamation of character and illegal. Do you all honestly support such actions?

None of you know me, have ever met me, have ever had any dealings with me, have ever been ripped off by me. I have never stolen anything from you.

For the record:

yes, I got struck off as a solicitor - but not for anything dishonest or illegal. I was struck off because I was not represented at the hearing because I could not afford to be.

I do not have a criminal record

I went bankrupt because my creditors forced me into bankrupty - why would I deliberately want to go bankrupt if that means I cannot act as a solicitor?

I have done nothing dishonest

I have done nothing illegal

I have not murdered, raped or beaten anyone up

I have not stolen any money or ripped anyone off

I simply had a nervous break down and lost my practice

I am not asking for sympathy. I walk in my own shoes and accept responsibility for my actions. I do not need your pitty

If this is all that you have in your lives then that is a real shame.

Please leave me to get on with my own.

However, if any of you wish to meet me then absolutely fine. You have my address. feel free to pop round. I can spare you a couple of hours. You meet me, listen to what I have to say and perhaps learn from my experiences - good and bad

One last thing: he who is without sin.....

Thankyou for taking the time to read my entry.

I look forward to reading your responses...............................

how did you find out that Barry was an escort

morning to you all

as a new entrant to this ongoing crazy discussion i would like to make comments on several aspects:

1  'Anon' is exactly wot they say they are - anonymous, and should be treated as such. If they  cannot   put a name to their comments they should be ignored with just contempt. it is pathetic
2  Barry should know better and ignore the site and leave everyone to it.he has done enough harm
3  Steve should explain his claims regarding being owed money. has he proof and if so why not share it.why is he owed money. did he actually do any work and if so can he prove it
4  we should meet and sort this guy out. But how much is true - what is a legal source? (Nat). I have looked at Checksure today and it confirms Mr YOUNG/ COSTELLO is NOT a director of any company, not the 18 someone else on here intimates - what is the truth?
5  someone has stated that Mr YOUNG is an escort - that may be so but it needs to be explained how that someone, initially moaning about Mr Young's legal activities, has suddenly managed to discover that he is an escort. I just don't buy that - did they trawl sites on a hunch that he was an escort which would take months (and a strange hunch)  or was there another way they found out such a random piece of info - it needs to be explained to be valid as there is a school of thought that this is a set up.how did the person in question discover Barry was an escort
6. how did steve know one of the brothers was hiding in Portugal - who is the source of all these gems of info?

this mr Young/Costello owes me but i need real credible info to help not spurious comments let's start being accurate and open rather than being anonymous and quibbling about pathetic issues like spelling mistakes - anyone fancy meeting up
James

http://www.checksure.biz/live/freeSearch_Dire ... earchId=5969466

have a look at this link guys 11/2/11  B Young not a director at any of his addresses

16014480 -  BARRY LUKE DAMIAN YOUNG    
  Address: , PR4  
     D.O.B: 1963  
  No of current directorships & company secretarials held:   0  

12871157 -  BARRY LUKE DAMIAN YOUNG    
  Address: LANCASHIRE, FY8  
     D.O.B: 1963  
  No of current directorships & company secretarials held:   0  

14060995 -  BARRY LUKE DAMIAN YOUNG    
  Address: LANCASHIRE, FY8  
     D.O.B: 1963  
  No of current directorships & company secretarials held:   0  

 

above copied from Checksure - check everybody proof is on the website link i provided

dave, maggie, george, terry, anon, chris, the other anon, the other chris, robert, john, nat and whoever else

why can nobody answer the questions asked rather than continue to make mindless comments we now have two peole too cowardly to name themselves as well as accusations and claims that cannot be backed up. i will you ask you all again where is the proof that barry earned a fortune in spain,who can claim to speak for everybody, why can't somebody other than Barry have an interest in him being vindicated , who is teh legal source behind nat

without tangible credibility to back up the claims the points are worthless and as for the original anon you have gone very quiet my friend are you not prepared to come out and talk like a man (or woman)

Here is my (lengthy) reply to all this
I have a gripe against Barry but in his own language "moved on". I became aware of this site and its content as a colleague mentioned it to me, I know solicitors may not be held in the highest esteem but this is the worst I have seen in recent years.
I think Barry is a guy with genuine intentions but who simply cannot deliver on his promises as a consequence other people get sucked into working for him and to a greater or lesser intent lose out as a result.
It is obvious that he is disliked by a great many people so it’s a far guess to assume that he has over the years not paid people.
I do not believe the claims he has drugs in the premises etc as being blunt I too work in legal circles and have not heard the stories and being as how its’ a bit of  a gentleman’s club I am pretty sure I would have heard about it.
What he did was blatantly stupid and he should not be allowed to practice any kind of law again, it was more than stupid it was unfair and showed an appalling lack of responsibility that affected other people at the time greatly. For this as well as other reasons Barry is not trusted by several legal people, he may well be tolerated but he isn’t trusted he is a affable and nice bloke to have around or share a drink with but most of my colleagues don’t trust him. He is simply a “risk too great”
It is also clear that Craig did have a genuine claim against Barry that may or may not have been settled it is further clear that Steve has a claim of some kind against Barry but Steve seems to be a guy who is deeply upset by it and chooses to attack Barry at regular intervals
Barry has decided to change his name etc but in reality it will do him little good as he will not be allowed to be a solicitor again it's as simple as that.
I doubt that Barry actually made fortunes abroad selling time shares etc he may like to portray that he did but I doubt it I also believe he may have decided to work abroad because of family out there.
As regards his will writing business it's all a bit naive really. Most people will write their wills with the help of a solicitor and will contact such a solicitor as they have had dealings with in the past, that is certainly the case in our business. Barry has neither the budget  nor the skills to market a will writing business to the extent it will need to be marketed in order to come to the attention of the wider public. It is a naïve idea to think he can and is just as naïve as the idea of setting up a business to business service that  shows prospective business people what it would be like to re locate to say Tunbridge Wells. That idea of his was plain stupid and I am pretty sure I saw something similar being destroyed on Dragons Den five or so years ago ?
It appears that Barry then decided to take the idea of helping people reclaim payment protection insurance payments from a business I believe he worked for and try the idea himself and therefore set up shop as Wired Legal Services this is the main reason why the original number was listed on here with people receiving missed calls etc. Again this idea is fatally flawed as Mr Young should have realised I will give you several  reasons I can think of :
(a)    In order to reclaim PPI payment Protection Insurance Payments your business HAS to be approved and certified by the Ministry of Justice Claims Management Regulatory Authority any such application costs money and is scrutinised Barry Young / Barry Costelle Monelle  etc  would NEVER have got such a licence as his past precludes him from getting one
(b)    The market for PPI reclaiming is in any case rapidly diminishing as it reaches saturation point also whereas before several companies would pay out now they will not.
(c)    There is also clear evidence that  Barry has flouted rules regarding contacting customers as you  CANNOT COLD CALL THEM –  Barry should have been aware of this
(d)    As he was not regulated by the Claims Management Regulatory body he could never have processed any claims – why not ?  Answer is that as soon as you lodge a claim on a persons’ behalf say against Lloyds TSB the first thing Lloyds TSB will do is check that you are authorised if you are not they won’t deal with you. – THIS IS A GOOD REASON FOR ANYONE WHO HAS SENT ANY DETAILS TO WIRED LEGAL SERVICES TO BE WORRIED THEY CANNOT PROCEED WITH YOUR CLAIM ALL THEY CAN DO IS THEN SELL YOUR CLAIM TO A THIRD PARTY


To put it simply WIRED LEGAL SERVICES IS NOT A LEGAL FIRM  it has no grounding in reality it is disliked in legal circles in the North West for that reason

As regards the stuff on here about Barry having set up as an escort I think it much more likely that someone with a gripe against him has set up the profiles themselves as regards the comments about Barry’s brother Lorne it is clear some of it is personal I have had little dealings with him

Perhaps it is time for some of you with a gripe to maybe move on a bit.  As I stated I had issues with him but simply put them down to experience and moved on I doubt very much that Barry will ever achieve the heights he had in the past. I know full well he loved being a solicitor but he won’t again

to 'does it really matter'

all i want is for anon to stop hiding and to say who they are and i want them to talk to me to prove that i am not Barry and and credibility to this site

looks like you all want to hide

I used to work for Barry.I was said to have ripped him of for thousands. Not the case.I wasn't caught with my hand in the till. Or lying to  a jury as a crown witness ? Remember that Barry.

From the tribunal findings.
Submissions from the Respondent(Mr Monelle)
31. the fish and chip shop "sale"

The arrangement had not worked out and in due course Mrs B and her family had been convicted of deception of The Benefits agency.It was only at that time that the Respondent and his brother realised the calibre of those individuals.


What hypocrisy and arrogance.It must have been their fault then.And were they really convicted of benefits evasion.Well we have Mr Monelle's fine word about that.

 And the calibre of the solicitor and proposed purchaser? shoddy, deceitful and nasty.

Disgraceful.

Hi everyone just to let you all know I applied for a job I saw in the job centre and I had a call from this guy "Barry Costello Monelle" claims he is the national sales manager working for a guy called Mark Butterwick who is the MD of a company called Quickdox, says he is looking to recruit regional managers to recruit sales guys to call on pre made appointments to discuss finance, utilities bills, etc in customers homes.

Having read all the comments on this site I was amazed really but it looks like they are still recruiting staff with the knowledge of the MD of Quickdox Mark Butterwick who cant have failed to notice all this stuff surely?

I think that all this is just pathetic, do you people really have nothing else better to do with your time. Barry is a really good person despite what you people might think.... has nothing ever happened to you, can you not imagine what you would feel like should this happen to you. I personally think that it is commendable that Barry has moved on with his life after all this. I can't believe that i have brought myself to write on here but i have had enough of you interfering people, what has anything he does with his life to do with you or affect you in any way... do us all a favour and move on before your rocking in your chairs waiting for the next person to reply to you! because you really are sad, sorry but someone had to tell you all.

cheers big ears

Esmerelda the goat's cheese? Goats adore butter and white suits.Barry Young Monelle Costello Delmonte Karl Lorne. I'm lost. Off message.

If you are esmeralda then that would make Barry Costello Monelle Quasimodo. he certainly looks the part.

Why did not you not confess your real name when sticking up for him? Too ashamed or scared?

You obviuosly havent known him very long if you still believe him and are feeling sorry for him. he has brought it all on himself.

why would i be scared? no i do not feel sorry for him, i pitty you lot more, that you have nothing else better to do, you people have said what you felt and that should be an end to it, just let it drop! i take it that you have never made mistakes? the comments now are nothing to with what has gone on... you are all vindictive,bitter and twisted.

i will not reply to anyone again... unlike you, i have trust and faith in him.... everyone deserves a second chance,  i have my own mind and i am not a sheep unlike some!

Mr Monelle . Please furnish evidence of the repayment of the £15,000 you were fined by the law society.I don't believe you have paid it. Thanks.

Think you'll find it's 15 Caunce Street, Blackpool. Not Corns Street Manchester.

Here's a map

http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?q=15+caunce+str ... dbcm8-yHFOLWRFg

The guy who runs this place is a con artist.

Are you sure there's an "a" in Caunce, be more apt if there wasn't one

Message from this number today about a seafood offer, think it was Young's Seafood Fish
Anyone else getting these?