08702202020

I never claimed to have ground breaking news on OE you came up with that yourself .Again you are making a lot of assumptions but I can't be bothered to type so

since you are the  smart one with this big  news on Sashas campaign meet me and tell me all about it im all ears . Where are you based ? Yea may be you can show me the light .

Why on earth would I meet you? How could you possibly help me? What are you going to do offer me an invite to Moulsdale's x'mas party?

Are you a journalist? I think it's safe to assume you are not. What I can do is track down Anon the fact that he/she used to be in contact with Sasha gives me a good idea where he/she is based. So I can't see it being to hard to track down a freelance journalist who has had issues with laser eye surgery in the area I am thinking of. I will gladly meet Anon personally to discuss my concerns.

Why I would want to meet a delusional former associate of Moulsdale is beyond me. The only knowledge you have is of Moulsdale's social gatherings which unlike you I have no interest in.

Sorry to sound like I'm stalking you Anon but I'll be in touch by phone or e-mail when I track you down. More than happy to meet up in person to prove I am not an OE employee. For now I'll leave the paranoid likes of Wondering and Speechless to accuse you of being an OE employee. I may be gone for the next few days Speechless but rest assured I'll be back my paranoid friend.

I'm definitely not delusional . And ur the one who is sending messages at me i never asked to be harrassed by you ? Why won't you meet me ? Its coming up to Christmas you clearly want to talk to me so I'll treat you to dinner wherever you want then you can tell me what you want to tell me about sasha and then maybe you will stop doing my head in  .

Ps the Savoy do a really nice afternoon tea if you are up for it .

Sorry to disappoint you but I've no real interest in talking to Moulsdale's former PA. Enjoy the X'mas party.

If you don't like my posts don't read them. These days I ignore 90% of your posts. What gives you the impression I want to talk to you? You're little more than Moulsdale's former party planner. Now I really am logging off for a few days. Sleep tight.

Oooo you are bottling it . I'm actually quite interested in meeting you . And sorry to disappoint you I am not David moulsdales former PA -LOL  You can come to my party if you want ? I'll leave that offer extended. It being the season of goodwill and all that .

@reading with interest
Lasik eyes was no help.  All of Sasha's posts seem to have been deleted "at the request of poster".  Emailed the moderator but got nothing more than confirmation of that.    I'm onto Google cache to see if I can trawl up any additional contacts/info.  She posted on lasik eyes for well over a year.  There must be something there that I've missed.  According to someone who was on the fringes of Sasha's campaign she had a disagreement with the forum and took herself and followers over to lasereyesupport.  Has now had a disagreement with lasereyesupport and is supposed to be developing her own forum.

Stumped for best way of communicating without being intercepted etc.  Is there any hint that you are able to give?

Speechless looking like a Sasha alias.  She may need to invent a new one.

@Wondering
Sasha's pay off was good value to Optimax - compare the cost and effect to a couple of TV adverts.  Times are hard in the industry at the moment.  Limit Optical Express and Russell not only gets increased market share but can more importantly increase margins.  Russell knows what a constant irritant Sasha can be.  Setting her on Moulsdale is a distraction and he probably finds it amusing.  In low margin, high turnover business you need every advantage you can give yourself.

@Tree of Light
You sound as if you are connected to the industry yourself.  You are well informed.  Care to give a hint (without disclosing your identity).  Publicity around this can only do good in exposing the industry and potentially regulate it.

@Tree of Light
You sound as if you are connected to the industry yourself.  You are well informed.  Care to give a hint (without disclosing your identity).  Publicity around this can only do good in exposing the industry and potentially regulate it."

Here is a big hint anon, you are quite sick for drumming up a vendetta against Sasha.  First you say you're  a journalist then bend in the wind saying you want to expose the industry!    If that 's true why don't you contact Sasha in person & stop your cowardly cyber bullying which is just taking attention away from the real problems?  

I don't give a dam if she has been bribed, paid off, gagged or anything else.  She has my support for her campaign against THE ENTIRE LASER EYE SURGERY INDUSTRY and she is the only person putting herself out there instead of blowing off here!

I won't be sharing anything with you.

I personally think you are respresenting David Moulsdale.
Look. David Moulsdale as I know that you are probably aware deserves everything that is coming to him no matter how it happens I am not sympathetic in any way to him or how he got done over by his competitiors in any shape or form. Because I have seen people cry because of him. I have seen people stress about their wages  because of him . And I happen to  be in the opinion of  thinking he enjoys lying to people.

SO if you ( probably)  want to get paid by David to sit there writing this total bull [***] here just to stop a campaigner and money means that much to you why dont you come and meet me maybe i can help you find a better job and or find a commercially viable story worth selling because you dont sound like you have had much luck so far.

@Tree of Light
There's nothing inconsistent in being a journalist and also wanting to expose the industry.  However, there is a major inconsistency in a campaigner for regulation of that industry who ignores a third of it.  If you cannot see that then there is probably very little that you could contribute.  As for contacting Sasha , she contacted me - at the start of her campaign, when Optimax was the major target.  There was no media interest at the time, so the story went nowhere.  It's going somewhere now that she has been bought off.

@Wondering
Sorry, you can believe whatever you want.  I only represent myself, not Optical Express, Optimax and don't have any connection with the laser industry except as a patient.  I'm not a Sasha alias/stooge, put in to raise the profile with a contentious post and give her something to answer.  As for the job offer, thanks very much, but I already have a varied enjoyable job.  As for bullsh*t, in avoiding the question and taking down the Optimax sites, Sasha has validated the documentation provided.

Isn't it more logical to call Sasha and ask your questions direct because I don't think anyone with half a brain would respond to you here? And a real journalist would normally give his name and contact details asking people to contact him with any information.

Nah! You don't ring true to me!

Will someone wake up here - it's Patrick James Green!!  

He's played the lot of you!!

@Jus' Me
Get real. What is Sasha going to say?  Yes I sold out my campaign? or just evade the question?  I also expose myself to threats and court gagging action before I've tied up my story? Regardless of Wondring's speculation, I work alone and don't have the finances to risk that.

I've previously put my contact details on reputable forums.  That's how I made my Optimax contact.  Sasha should know who I am, but, without confirmation of contact details neither she nor Optimax (nor Optical Express) can silence or stop me.

Before going further, I needed confirmation that the documentation provided and associated claims were genuine.  It certainly looks good, as do some of the later emails.  Sasha has had the opportunity here to directly deny the existence of a gagging clause, to deny that she is working directly with Optimax or that she has dismissed her Optimax campaign.  She chose to dodge the question and thereby not contravene the conditions of her settlement. She also put up a smokescreen using aliases. That's good enough for me.  It makes it worth pursuing further, but not here.

Yes I think you should keep your story secret until you have finished it otherwise you never know some other journalist might steal your idea and publish it before you do . Don't risk your finances.

Maybe David moulsdale will sell history to the papers . Anything could happen.

Oh Patrick, pretending to be a journalist wasn't one of your best aliases, you should have remembered that I only ever talked to the main press, Sunday Express, Daily Mail etc...

And please don't misquote me again: on 2 March 2012, when you asked how much it was worth for me to give up my campaign for government legislation, I clearly told you, "not for a million pounds".

A campaign which is, and always has been, aimed at the entire refractive eye surgery industry, not one individual company.  
http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/28629

Btw, next time you're visiting the Windy City let me know as I have good friends there ;)

In case you're wondering (apologies Wondering I know he's not!) the WB on this occasion is the same one who gave me a copy of Stephen Hannan's 'wanted' poster, previously up in OE premises, declaring me to be a credit card fraudster.  

I'm spoilt for choice here, who to sue first?  You for attempted bribery (as advised by police I spoke to last month concerning your involvement with the Andrew Elphick case), or Stephen Hannan for defamation of character (actually OE according to my lawyer).  Decisions, decisions...

Want to play some more?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdUWgvEo2Mc

Hope it makes you laugh as much as I did at your desperate attempts to discredit me ;)

NB: More of that recording will be published on revamped OERML website coming soon, along with some very interesting & verifiable facts!!

If David is trying to sell OE, wouldn't it be easier to work with me to help his patients, rather than, yet again, drawing more negative publicity by fighting me as he did with the OERML Nominet case?  
http://www.opticalexpressruinedmylife.co.uk

Can't really give a hint without Sasha realising who I am. I will do my best the next few week to find your contact details. If I can't track you down I will have to think of something else. Know what you mean about Sasha's old posts criticsing Optimax and saying she will never take down ORML disappearing. It's like the campaign against Optimax never happened hardly the actions of someone who has nothing to hide. Also Sasha's lack of internet activity the last couple of months is rather telling.

Not surprised she has fallen out with the person responsible for lasereyesupport, Sasha's belligerence and arrogance when dealing with people has alienated alot of people who were at one time allies. Sasha seems to think she is some sort of mastermind when in reality she is just a small time flip-flop vendor.

@Sasha I thought you said I was Patrick and that Anon was someone from lasik-eyes? Make your mind up! So have you contacted that Optimax patient who posted that video on here offering them your support? Thought not.

Also notice how Sasha's post makes no mention of the Optimax accusations? It's almost as if she wasn't allowed to mention Optimax on a public forum!

Do you mean like how  David Moulsdale probably thinks he's an optical industry leading mastermind who is now  probably flopping in my opinion big style but still probably has you convinced to go fight his corner while he's probably cowering in a corner somewhere right ?

So when are you coming to meet me to tell me how bad sasha is or are you going to carry on hiding like David Moulsdale seems to be ?