08702202020

Her legal battle with Optimax also shows that she has a price.

What was the price of your integrity Sasha? All those big promises you made about how Optimax could never silence you don't ring so true now do they?

Yes I originally came on here wanting Moulsdale phone number - when have I ever denied that? Surely if I was an OE employee I would already have had Moulsdale's phone number. How does me wanting Moulsdale's phone number prove I'm a plant?!?!

Agree with Anon there is definitely some flawed logic going on around this website. Why would OE plant someone to keep a negative website about their company high up on the goggle search engine? That really makes sense - not.

Im wondering why anon wants to sell a story about someone who may well have Operated within the law by settling with Optimax even if she did and doesn't see why a more interesting and saleable story would be David Moulsdale allegedly sending someone to bribe Sasha as sasha alleges?

Ask David moulsdale even he would probably agree that that story about him would sell better than a sasha story of any description.Who knows if he needs the money badly enough he might even sell you some comments for your article. ! It might help him pay the rent ! In fact if you ask him nicely I'm sure he would would agree and ask for a percentage of the revenue generated from newspaper sales .

I don't think a conspiracy Theory story about Sasha is going to sell anything . Sorry .

@bystander shocking video! hopefully Wondering and Speechless have watched this video since they are so keen to defend Sasha and Optimax. So Speechless still think Optimax offer fantastic care to their patients?

So Sasha where are your offers of help to this person in the youtube video who has had their eyes badly damaged by Optimax?

I hope you are getting your money's worth from David moulsdale because if I were you I'd rather die than work for a plonker like him
.

Trust me he is not worth it and if he is so bothered by Sashas campaign you should tell him to grow some balls and sort it out himself .

I don't defend anyone I'm just fascinated to watch how that plonker David Moulsdale can get away with offerring an alleged bribe to sasha amongst all the other things he is seriously disliked for in my view and you like the people that society can do without probably got paid or has some financial interest in making sure that sasha is discredited when In my view the biggest plonker David can carry on as it seems running riot and as it seems bringing the industry into disrepute .

And I'm not defending sasha but I find it very shocking to even consider the thought that someone's private and confidential medical problems are being discussed as openly as this on the Internet by you. Talking about how easy it is to fix etc . That's somebody's eyes you are talking about you need to show some respect I think .

Why do you keep quoting people as saying things they didn't?
When did I ever say Optimax offer fantastic care to their patients?
Think you've scored an own goal here as it  looks like Sasha is helping this guy going by the links below the video!
So much for your conspiracy theory lol!
Think you should go off & write a book cos you don't seem to have much else to do with your time but stone Sasha!

Confuseddotcom! It's your new mate who writes & has a conspiracy theory -so easy to confuse the pair of you!

@Wondering
Sasha is almost, but not quite incidental to the story.  But necessary in order to tie it together.  This is about big business, Glasgow self made man with alleged criminal connections versus public school boy given a head start by daddy.

Ask yourself, as a business, how do you deal with an irritant like Sasha, whilst you have much bigger fundamental problems like a shrinking market, a large infrastructure which needs constant customer flow and an aggressive competitor like Optical Express.  One answer is to re-focus the irritant on that competitor.  Optical Express obviously came to a similar conclusion but set Sasha's price too low.  With Ultralase in financial problems, they are out of it.  Optical Express and Optimax are competing in the gutter for the low end of the market.  Both are critically dependent on constant patient throughput in order to keep going.  Sasha's campaign against OE means more market share for Optimax.  Anyone thinking of Sasha being honourable should remember the way in which she shafted Patrick James Green -  I'm told that he and Sasha knew each other prior to this.

@reading with interest
Well said.  Why the sudden lack of interest in Optimax is a key question?  Which Sasha cannot answer honestly without breaking the gagging clause.

No I'm not active on lasik eyes or on any other forums really. I followed lasik eyes whilst Sasha was still posting there, but didn't post myself.

I don't really have any suggestions for contact. There is no way on this forum that either of us can guarantee that we are talking to each other.   Apart from Sasha's multiple aliases, there is at least one Optimax employee playing the game on her side and several who really have no idea what is going on around them.  Best bet is either a forum which allows PMs from new members or disposable email addresses until we are certain.

If you have ever met David moulsdale you will know that sasha shafting Patrick was the best thing she should've done because David deserved it . He's not in my view a big businessman - though he does in my view have a big mouth claiming about how big and a shot of a businessman he is and I'm sure if you did a survey if the industry you will probably find out how many people have had bad experiences of him and his company which I think you should do to make things clearer in your head .
I do know what competition is thanks but as you have probably noticed Russell probably won't need any help from a campaigner to bring OE down it is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard . David moulsdale is in my view a really great but ridiculously obvious example of how not to do it in optics and has been running his business into the ground in my view way before he even entered laser eye which is probably why he had to enter laser eye in the first place and now he's probably screwed that up too Is most probably looking for a buyer I would think . And Russell Ambrose I feel sure doesn't need to worry about OE given David moulsdales track record of acting like a plonker and pissing everyone off in my view .

If you think Russell ambroses  best strategic plan all year was to send sasha to have a go at Optimax his daddy would've wasted that head start and Im sure Russell is not that stupid or ridiculous .

@wondering if the only support Sasha can get nowadays is from someone who remains anonymous despite claiming to have groundbreaking news on OE then she is in big trouble. Anon has people prepared to talk to them that are far more credible than someone who keeps making big claims but never backs anything up.

I don't necessarily agree that Sasha's payoff is part of some conspiracy but what is beyond question is that when Optimax paid her a website and twitter feed criticising Optimax disappeared off the face of the internet.

I think Sasha's small band of followers need to realise there is a huge difference between criticising Sasha and defending OE. I have criticised Sasha on many occasions and will continue to do so but I have never once defended OE and will never will.

Speechless is anything but what their name suggest if you can find one post of mine defending Moulsdale and OE tell me the page number and date it was posted. OE need to be held fully accountable for damaging patient eyes but so to do Optimax which is something Sasha has conveniently forgotten.

lasereyeforum.com allows members to send PM's but I think we would still have the problem of not knowing if the other person is real. Membership is free but I really don't know the best way to proceed. It's definitely worth chasing up the lasikeyes lead Sasha gave you as they probably know alot more than me. I do though have some information on Sasha's campaign that I think you would be interested in hearing.

@wondering if you really wanted to help Sasha as you so often claim than you would have contacted her when she asked you to on several occasions. As per usual your only defence of Sasha is to accuse anyone who dares to criticise her of being an OE employee. You not talking to Sasha is helping Moulsdale far more than anything I or Anon could say(if all your claims of insider knowledge are to be believed). You have posted nothing that convinces me you are nothing but a figment of Sasha's paranoid imagination.

If you truly did have information that could bring Moulsdale down you would have given it to Sasha when she asked.

I hope Moulsdale does go bankrupt, Sasha is exposed by Anon and eventually proper government regulation for laser eye surgery is approved. That to me is the perfect ending Sasha Rodoy is far from being the saint she tries to portray herself as. Hope you watched that youtube video from that Optimax customer Sasha and you sleep well on your pile of money.

Sorry who has got ground breaking news on OE and since you want to know who everyone else is why are you remaining anonymous .

@speechless you are the Queen of accusing people of saying things they didn't. The amount of times you have accused me of defending OE but can never provide the details of this so called OE defence. The fact you often resort to petty insults and name calling shows how out of your depth you really are. Don't even get me started on the number of times you have accused me of being an OE employee every time you can't think of a concise argument(which is pretty often). Now your accusing Anon of being an OE employee - now there is a surprise.

You are so full of [***] it's unreal . Do I sound  like I give a monkeys what you think and do you really think anyone is interested in hearing your contradictory senile ramblings ?

I don't have groundbreaking news on OE never claimed I did. You were the one who claimed that. What I do have is information on Sasha's campaign. Fact of the matter is that ever since Sasha signed the alleged gagging order her internet activity has subsided considerably and many of her old posts have mysteriously disappeared off other forums.Normally if I criticised Sasha she couldn't wait to respond not so much the case these days. You can't claim to be a campaigner for change in an industry when you purposely turn a blind eye to what over 30% of that industry is doing.

My ramblings I think you will find the last few weeks I have hardly posted at all. Only started posting again the end of last week. You are the one who posts every single day with the same old clap-trap about Moulsdale. Moulsdale does need to be held accountable but a bitter ex-personal acquaintance going on about X'mas parties is not going to get it done. You're so blinded by your hate of your former employer you can't see that Sasha has abandoned Optimax patients.I bet you probably haven't even taken the time to watch the video posted by the Optimax patient have you?

Of course you haven't because it has nothing to do with Moulsdale. Sasha's campaign is about regulation for an entire industry not just one company when will you get that through your thick head?

Or should I say Sasha's campaign WAS supposed to be about regulation for an entire industry.