08702202020

@anon, can't be bothered answering more of your critique, we shall agree to disagree. I will say is that even the top surgeons make mistakes, and Dr Boshnick has to treat the fallout from those guys too. There is no equivalent to what he does, its fairly unique. I only know of the Boston Foundation for sight, who charge around 2-3 times his price. No point talking hypothetical s, 'if this' etc.. No one will get prosecuted, no one will be held responsible.

As for Sasha - she works for Ambrose now, her campaign is just a lie, your right, she seems to have lost all her disciples, hope they were paid but presume they walked of their own accord. Looks like its a common theme of alienating people. Lets hope she takes her money and disappears.

Been readin' all this with intrigue..... Agree with the majority, Sasha is most likely doing harm to potential legislation rather than good. Anyone who really wanted legislation wouldn't sell out so easily. Especially to the likes of Ambrose.

Let's face it, if she had her eyes botched at OE, she would have been paid off by Moulsdale, start working for him and be going on about how bad Optimax is. What a loser!

I don't know what Sasha did or didn't get from Optimax any more than you do -but she is entitled to whatever compensation she can get and I don't see that affects her campaign or helping others. If she had to sign a gagging order who are we to criticise?

"reposting under various identities" make me laugh as she is the only person I see who ever posted on WCM as herself -who are you?? reading with interest?? anon?? and the rest?? if we listened to you lot then I might start believing you are sasha -get real!

Sasha has made a stand against this industry and it is obvious to me -and by everything I see here -that the industry -especially Optical Express -will do everything they can to discredit her.

Easy to attack someone if you hide behind a fake name - and you expect her to "explain herself" to cowards and bullies like you!

If you are all so righteous with nothing to hide then why not be open and say who you are?

@ Jus' me
I do know what Sasha got from Optimax and I only post under one name.  She was entitled to fair compensation and she got a lot more than that - in return for dropping Optimax as a target and working against OE.

Yes, Sasha did make a stand against the industry and it was needed.  Now she has sold out and should be held to account.  I post under Anon because doing otherwise would allow Optimax lawyers to put an injunction on me and would also get my contact at Optimax into deep trouble.  Irrelevant, because Sasha should know who I am and how to contact me - if she didn't delete my email (Jan/Feb 2012).

I suspect that reading with interest is also known to Sasha because he/she claims to have emails from Sasha and must, at one time have been fairly close in order for Sasha to boast of her exploits and The dude also intimates at insider information.

If she puts herself in the public eye and promotes a campaign which then drops a major part of the industry then she should explain herself - especially to the people who signed her e-petition and now wonder where the campaign is going.

Sasha has every right  to compensation from Optimax which if she has received it .

I think optical express are playing a dirty game by typing on here and discrediting her .

Let's not forget the abusive comments made by reading with interest which has included foul language .Potentially an optical express employee  I think .

And finally . Putting aside the laser regulation aspect. Some enlightening feedback about OEs regard for customers and employees written earlier which I think quite rightly should be reported. See below .

Maybe some insight re optical express ??

Should be ' reposted '

As posted by  'onwards and upwards' earlier on the forum

'Optical Express is a joke of a company, Mr David Moulesdale can give all the motivational speeches he likes but the truth is David and his management don't give a toss about the customers or his staff. Its all about the money......To line his pocket no one elses!!!

I can't see why this hasn't made the news, especially having 152 UK stores now reduced to just under 80!

David thinks nothing of closing the stores and telling no one, till staff and customers turn up for their work. To find the shop closed, emptied of all stock and can't explain to loyal customers that are there to collect their glasses or contact lenses which they have paid for that they cant help or advise them as they didnt know themselves,Disgusting!! Then the process of having to fight tooth and nail for refunds.,is another hurdle, they will gladly take the money from you but getting it back is another thing all together.
Not just  with the customer refunds, every company be it glasses,contact lens orders,distribution,sanitation products,ink catridges, printer maintenence,  or simple stationery orders are all bounced as they move on to the next unsuspecting company!
The amount of people that have been made redundant before christmas is alarming and yet he is still having his Christmas Party at Glasgow Hilton, Doesn't have a concience to stand up there and give it the big I AM, he's doing alright, stuff the ones that put in the graft and actually do a days work for him!
Yes people, customers and employee's talk, whole place is corrupt to the core.....Not what you know, It's who you know in there.
Aslong as the senior management bow down to David and answer all his demands, there fine and dandy, minute David needs to rein some cash back in, close stores, pay people off!!! Just like that!!'

Lol -you must be very important if you think she kept your message from nearly a year back!

Read the campaign petition -no named company.

And -your excuse that Optimax lawyers would put an injunction on you is a joke because you are not gagged -and if Sasha is gagged I am sure she would be pleased for it to come out -nobody signs a gagging order because they want to.

And -if she knows you why not contact her instead of playing secret squirrel with your mates here?

And -no injunction on Sasha for the things she has said about Optical Express -must be true!

@Jus'me
No not important, but at the time she was desperate to talk to a journalist, so she should remember being contacted by one.

I read the petition when I signed it.  You are absolutely right - no named company just the industry as a whole.  So why is she ignoring a third of it?

An injunction can be taken out for other reasons than breaking a gagging clause!!

Sasha conducts her campaign in public and has had the chance to deny being bought off in public.  She has continually avoided answering the question.  That confirms the documentation.

As has been said before and ignored, why on earth should OE raise the profile of Sasha's campaign by either posting here or sueing for libel?  Think!

@Wondering and Reposted
Why are you re-posting old posts? I also read the interchange between you and reading with interest before it was deleted, the name calling started with you.

Oh do you mean when I wrote

Illkissmoulsdalesasstillhehasnomoneylefttopayme@floptical.com?

What were you reading ?Hardly name calling I was just asking him if it was his email address . It's not my fault readingwithinterest got over emotional and burst a blood vessel - hardly name calling .

It's not my fault he couldn't take it like a man.

@Wondering
"It's not my fault he couldn't take it like a man."  or his fault when you couldn't take retaliation in kind and hardly foul language.  Bickering like a couple of schoolkids.

@Insider
I did wonder about Jus' me, care to hint as to how you know?

Bus Driver, Insider and Reading with Interest are all senior Optical Express people.  I ain't Sasha.
Going for Sasha will backfire as she is just one of a massive number of people with eyes damaged by LVC. The tipping point has been and gone, it is too late for you desperate fools to try and carry put damage limitation.

So there we have it .Here's a Of course fictious  poem dedicated to moulsdale and his fan club .

Some desperate bosses  from a company called OE
Which shut many shops really sadly
Came back to say that all is well
To put us under a magic spell?

They forgot to tell us the customers were sad
They didn't get refunds - isn't that mad?
The employees who didn't know
And David Moulsdale didn't show

Pay our rent - landlords were in a rage
But Moulsdale still had his wage
And lo and behold in a while
He will be partying with a smile

The misguided employees who sit online
For a while they will be fine
Till they do what moulsdale desires
He uses he exploits then he fires

Moulsdale doesn't give a damn
It starts to look like one big scam
People are hurting customers are sad
But moulsdale still tells us he's not bad

Why do bosses want to lie
Employers who can't answer WHY
And silence those think it's wrong
moulsdale thinks we arent strong

But destiny speaks she's not shy
She will tell Moulsdale why
you may silence those who speak
But destiny - she's not weak

As karma does as she is told
Letting natural justice unfold
Customers stop gracing your stores
Yet you still blame others and fight your wars

Moulsdales heart is frozen cold
He does actually need to be told
Lots of people thought he was great
But he considered this with too much weight

One day moulsdale you will see
The collapse of the business was meant to be
You  have abused trust - never saw what matters
And in doing so left your business in tatters

@Tree of Light
And the point that you are presumably trying to make in posting the link to the YouTube video is that Sasha is still active against Optimax?  Sorry, wrong.

It's an old video pre-dating Sasha's "arrangement" with Russell Ambrose of Optimax and used as leverage to persuade Ambrose to cut a deal with her.  Re-published today by Hydra1able (Mr Abs?) not Sasha.  That wouldn't happen to be you would it?

Has reading with interest become Anon to run from my  asking if there is any truth in the allegation by ' 'Chang' ' who called David Moulsdale the ' jimmy saville of the eye world ' ?

Also to answer my question as to whether there Is any basis to my deduction from the abusive behaviour of reading with interest on this forum (which has now been deleted ) where he called me a slapper -that he could potentially be a senior manager at optical express who may be abusive and derogatory towards women ?

@Wondering
No, I'm not a dual/multi personality on this site, unlike some posters.

Not being in any way associated with Moulsdale, Ambrose, Optical Express, Optimax or any branch of the LVC industry, I have no idea as to whether there is any truth in your allegation.  Given your supposed knowledge of Mr Moulsdales party activities, you would appear to be best placed to answer your own question.

Although I would like to contact reading with interest in order to have copies of the other Sasha emails, I have no idea as to his employers or his employment.  Given the hints, I would assume that he is either a former associate of Sasha or an employee of Optimax.  Why not explain how you know so much about Moulsdale and his proclivities?

U ppl are mad!  It's like going on holiday/ buying a car personally I don't look at the company website I use trip advisor for example some bad reviews some good. End of the day we all have a choice if laser surgery interests u then maybe get answers to any questions u have through online! Very simple! If u think ppl are forced into it then maybe they should grow a set of balls! The ppl able to afford laser aren't stupid by any means so why are they acting thay way now!? As for the moulsdale issue? Who actually cares, not importanta most company directors are upto no good! Get a life do a little research and let ppl be ppl!!

- who is ' Chang '? He / she wrote that - I'm just wondering . I am particularly interested because based on this swearing derogatory behaviour from readingwithinterest presumably 'he' may know more .

As you know reading with interest wants to meet me at a Hilton in Nottingham on the 20th.

We know 'he' can be abusive online . What if ' he ' turns  out to be abusive in person ?

Are you a senior manager at optical express paid to write online in David Moulsdales favour ?
Are you reading with interest trying to cover up foul language and abusive language towards women ?

Do you think readingwithinterest regularly calls women slappers ?
Do you think readingwithinterest was David Moulsdale ?

@Wondering
You have had your answer many times  Try reading!

Once again, because you obviously have comprehension and memory issues:
1) I'm not reading with interest
2) I would like to get in contact with him
3) I have absolutely no business/financial connection with Optical Express
4) I have absolutely no business/financial connection with Optimax - unlike Sasha
5) I have absolutely no business/financial connection with any other part of the LVC industry

I have no idea whether reading with interest regularly calls women slappers, or whether the expression is apt in your case.  As the name calling was initiated by you, he might find you to be abusive in person as well as on line.  If you are Sasha, that is probably the case.

I doubt whether reading with interest is David Moulsdale because there is no gain in raising the profile of this thread and he also has better and more urgent issues on which to spend his time than calling you names, however, satisfying that he might find that.

You've been asking questions.  Why not explain how you know so much about Moulsdale and his proclivities?