08702202020

I think you are someone who Lies a lot .

"....Sasha is fanatical about recording everything.  Every email, screen shots of forums, conversations,

You claim to have not met nor spoken with Sasha and she's previously stated on WCM that she doesn't know you as a journalist. Yet you claim to have so much knowledge about what she does!

"That email address was a temporary, used only to make contact with informer.  Link satisfactorily established now.  Some interesting info exchanged!everything...."

Oh dear! Talking to imaginary friends online, hopefully your family are aware of your delusions?

You are obsessed and I would advise Sasha to consider reporting you for cyber stalking!

Spot your contradictions:
______________
Page 57:
Anon (the original)
26 Nov 2012

...I was one of many approached to publish the story when Sasha first started her campaign...
________________
Page 59
Anon (the original)
27 Nov 2012

.... As for contacting Sasha , she contacted me - at the start of her campaign....
____________________
Page 81
Anon (the original) replies to ExOE
1 h 3 min ago

...Yes, I did email her about her experiences, but she only wanted to deal with the mainline media...
_____________________
Page 81
Anon (the original) replies to Wondering
7 h 6 min ago
....I approached Sasha by email, she emailed me....
_____________________

Dig that hole any deeper and you'll be on the beaches of Oz!

Is the thread not accepting more posts. Innocuous comment posted by myself has gone, also further comments.

Disregard above, refreshed page, and all returned...

Could you please post your comment on REVIEW CENTER OPTICAL EXPRESS LASER SURGERY.....there are many complaints here about deposits taken for surgery when the patient was not suitable and where OE have kept the money for several months using excuse after excuse
Could you also post on OERML
Much appreciated if you can

@anon if you want some more info on Sasha I'd be happy to help you out.

Previous posts from reading with interest (Anon's imaginary friend) re David Moulsdale:

10 Jul 2012
"....As someone who has been plagued with cold calls from this company I would most certainly like to give the owner a piece of my mind...."
____________
11 Jul 2012
....I'm sure there would be many people(myself included) who would appreciate being able to tell the toe-rag what we think of him....
____________

;)

Well done you can read. I was trying to get Moulsdale's phone number but I've got that now. My main aim now is to expose Sasha Rodoy for the liar she is. Ex-OE why don't you go down the jobcentre and look for another job. I don't think someone who had the lack of character to work for OE is in a position to criticise anyone. Also what business is it of yours if I want to talk to Anon? That's right it's none of your business.

The fact that you once worked for OE shows the complete lack of character you have and if it wasn't for OE making you redundant I bet you would still be quite happily taking their money whilst damaging patients eyes. The opinions of bitter ex-employees don't give credence to Sasha's lies.

@Ex-OE would you be on this forum if OE hadn't of sacked/made you redundant? No I thought not. It's easy to take a moral stand against OE after they sack/made you redundant. Where was this moral stand a year ago when you were happily employed by OE? Don't try and act like a martyr after you happily accepted OE's blood money for years on end with no complaint. I'm sure you've turned a blind eye to many a damaged patient during your stint with OE.

Reading with interest is sooooooo boring .

@reading so are you Sasha but that's life!

@Wondering
"Wondering replies to Anon (the original)
12 h 53 min ago
I think you are someone who Lies a lot "
_____________________________________________________________________________________
You should try thinking more often.  You need the practice because you are wrong again.


@Ex OE
No inconsistency at all - a forwarded request for media contacts from Sasha, my response, her reply then taken no further.

I haven't met or spoken with Sasha, but I have corresponded with a number of people who have.  That's where I got a lot of my information.  No imaginary friends, just people who feel used,  don't like the way in which Sasha operates and don't want other people to be scammed the same way.  If Sasha wants to stop my comments all that she needs to do is categorically deny that she is working with Optimax against Optical Express, not for any moral crusade, but because she couldn't arrange a consultancy with Optical Express.

@reading with interest
too many Sasha followers and aliases on here.  Drop a hint as to your info.  Good point re Ex OE.

@Watching from the wings
Would you please explain why you think that Reading's reply to reading with interest is critical of OE? and therefore how reading with interest accusing Reading of being Sasha is bullying?

A reminder, Reading posted:-
"Reading with interest is sooooooo boring ."

Of course Wondering and Ex-OE would never accuse anyone disagreeing with Sasha of being an OE employee would they Watching from the wings?

If you go back through the history of this thread you will find that Sasha's followers and Sasha herself have regularly accused various people of being OE employees with no evidence whatsoever. Yet when the tables are turned and they are accused of being alias's they don't like it so much do they?

It's also interesting how Watching from the wings wants this discussion moved to the OERML forum so that it can be easily controlled. Free speech is still free speech even when it doesn't suit that individuals purposes.

Views comments and opinions on forum about David Moulsdale - the owner of Optical Express

1. He has no interest in the wellbeing of his workforce, which is why he abuses his position of trust as an employer to prey on and get involved with young females (employees) through lies , hires multiple bedrooms at his Optical Express Christmas parties and gets his PA to pick up for him. ( as Alleged by 'EX' a commentor on this forum )- I think he therefore demonstrates his attitude towards the the duty of care he has towards his employees.

Another commentor called ' Chang ' has dubbed David Moulsdale the ' Jimmy Saville of the eye world '

2. Someone anonymous  called 'ex' has written on this forum , insinuating that David Moulsdale is using drugs.It is rumoured previous to this that Moulsdale has been using cocaine according to 'speechless.'

3.He is so interested in the best standards of eye care that he (as Sasha Rodoy alleges) has offered a government campaigner a bribe- in contravention to the bribery act and the law, not to campaign for government legislation in laser eye- surely the better option was to work with her?

4. In Personnel Today 2005 it was reported as follows

'Optical Express/The Dental Clinic has been accused of managing its staff badly and ignoring employment regulations. Personnel Today has received a letter from a source close to the company detailing a number of questionable employment practices - all of which have been denied by the management.'

5. David Moulsdale been reported in the papers to have affiliations with a well known scottish gangster.

6. He seems to have no problem with removing feedback about him from the internet (eg this forum, ex staff of optical express facebook pages and wikipedia) so and trying to inimidate people to not be involved in saying anything negative about him- probably so he can drag more people into his fantasist life of no consequences. (The ex staff of Optical Express had nearly 200 members with mainly negative feedback which has now been removed from the Internet )

7.  David Moulsdale has had his company offer complaining customers refunds - allegedly( Orml info) only when they sign a gagging order stopping them from telling others about their experience. see opticalexpressruinedmylife.co.uk

8. some customers who have struggled to get refunds and or compensation have written testimonies on opticalexpressruinedmylife.co.uk-

9. There are comments on this forum suggesting people feel intimidated by Moulsdale eg .'bob etc'

10. Moulsdale has borrowed heavily from RBS (to make his millions) which has been bailed out by taxpayers to run a business which has recently caused an 80 store subsidary go into administration and job losses, causing tensions with landlords as reported in the Telegraph.OE was accused of shutting shop before the rent was due .

11.  in 2007 Optical Express became engaged in a dispute with HMRC . This was over a disputed 10.9 million pounds in taxes.

12. Optical Express has been reported in the Which magazine as being the worst performing optical chain

13. Optical Express were featured on tv programme Watchdog which sent undercover  customers into their stores. They accused OpticalExpress of providing misleading information to customers and underplaying risks of laser eye surgery .

LOL I was "wondering" when you would show up. Almost managed to go more than 16 hours without posting which is a record for you. Shame that when you do post it's the same thing you've posted umpteen times before.Bet you can't go a whole day without posting - heck you couldn't even manage it on x'mas day. When most of us were with family and friends you were on here posting!

Are you just stressed because of

www.opticalexpressruinedmylife.co.uk

Kind of wierd to know you have been thinking about me- and wondering when I'm
Going to show up -

You were counting the hours too ?

Have you fallen in love with me or something ? It's a bit creepy you know .

@wondering don't need to count the hours the posts are all time stamped genius! Why would I be stressed about opticalexpressruinedmylife? It has no bearing on me whatsoever. You had the chance to prove I was a so-called OE employee by meeting me but after spending weeks begging me to meet you, you backed out because you knew I would expose you for the farce you are. You have no evidence of anything unlike myself and only deal in rumours and innuendo. Guess you can't get over the fact you weren't invited to Moulsdale's x'mas party and had to spend x'mas on your own in front of your PC posting on here.

@watching from the wings there is no stoning area for Sasha merely the truth coming out about her. How is moving the discussion to a forum that Sasha owns freedom of speech? Sasha promoted this forum for months on end when it suited her needs. As soon as the discussion turned to her Optimax "hush" money she couldn't disappear quick enough. This after all was a woman who before her settlement was a shameless self-promoter and often instigated arguments on numerous forums. If you want to post only on opticalexpressruinedmylife be my guest but it won't stop me and others from posting the truth about Sasha on here. No ones forcing you to post on here but Sasha has only herself to blame for the amount of internet traffic that frequents this forum as she was after all the person who created most of it. If it wasn't for Sasha I wouldn't even know this forum existed.

@Watching from the wings
By all means post on the OERML forum.  You'll find it as strongly controlled, or more so, than Optimax and Ultralase forums.  Any views which differ will be deleted, apart from the token ones planted/allowed by Sasha to stir up the troops.

This forum and others will still be used to post allegations which she dare not post on her own website, but does feel that she can safely link to them.  It's called plausible deniability, but, as Lord MacAlpine has proved, it's not a waterproof defence.

If you still thnk that the campaign for industry wide legislation is live ask yourself where Sasha was when the media were intently looking for comment on the initial cosmetic surgery report.

The campaign for industry wide legislation of the laser vision correction industry is dead.  The great campaigner herself has been bought off by Optimax and is owned by Ambrose.  Some conditions imposed:-

 To remove the website and not put up another one
 To close down the email associated with the website
 To close the Twitter account
 Not to communicate with any Optimax patient
 A gagging clause

No wonder that the vast majority of cases come from Optical Express if she is not allowed to communicate with Optimax patients!


No this isn't "supposed to be about Optical Express".  It's supposed to be about tele-marketing and other nuisance calls.  Just because it has been largely hijacked by ex-employees, people with emotional issues and personal vendettas doesn't mean that you can restrict content to your own agenda.