08702202020

ohhhhhh

you mean i have to keep changing it !

Oh ok I get it now.

@Ex-OE assuming I am Anon is an uneducated response but I would expect nothing less from someone who was a Moulsdale wage slave without the integrity to get a "proper" job.

You only appeared on these boards after OE started closing stores so I think it's safe to say they terminated your employment rather than the other way around. You keep dodging the question so I will ask it again. How many damaged OE patients did you turn a blind eye to whilst working at OE?

@wondering LOL it's so funny when you go off on an angry rant about people of picking on you after you spend weeks calling them names and accusing them of being OE employees. Newsflash just because someone doesn't agree with your constant unimaginative re-posts doesn't make them Moulsdale!

I'm not angry or ranting love ! Lol

Glad to see you've finally got over not being invited to Moulsdale's x'mas party and having to spend your x'mas day alone posintg on this forum!

LOL

i wasnt the only one to post!
why attack me?

Windering, re-posts clutter the pages.

Thank you!

Hi,

thanks for your response,

Ill try to make it a bit less spacious and add more info as we go along? If thats ok with you?

wondering XX

@windering even the forum owner thinks you are full of nothing but wind!

Now that's not what she wrote - that's your opinion ?


Julia is actually very kind to let you swear at women on this forum and still let you write here !

@windering that might have something to do with the fact I never swore at you! Julia has access to the deleted posts so your lies are not going to work on her! the only swearing occurred in your overactive imagination.

I do think Julia is doing a good job in cracking down on your constant re-posting of the same thing four or five times a day. If anyone is close to getting banned it's you Windering.

@Wondering

Wondering replies to Anon (the original)
9 h 54 min ago
No one wants a discussion with you .

How come you haven't written your news piece yet? I'm dying to read it.  ( liar )
_______________________________________________________________________________

Wrong yet again, but then you're very good at being wrong.  Did you get a GCSE in that?

As I advised in one of my previous posts I'm aiming for publication to follow the publication of the Keogh inquiry recommendations (Easter).


I'm sure that Julia won't mind these re-posts

"Julia replies to Wondering
13 Jan 2013
Re-posts have been removed.
Wondering, please do not re-post the same message. Thank you!"

and

"Julia replies to Wondering
4 h 21 min ago
Windering, re-posts clutter the pages.
Thank you!"


In case you didn't get the message - Wondering don't clutter these pages by re-posting.  Julia has been very kind and a lot more tolerant than many website admins.

Now look who's reposting!

So -do you work for Optical Express or have they made you redundant now ?

Wondering replies to Anon (the original)
a few seconds ago
Now look who's reposting!

So -do you work for Optical Express or have they made you redundant now ?
____________________________________________________________________

Clever of you to spot that!  The hint was probably in the use of the word "re-posts".  I thought that I'd better re-post since the message obviously hadn't got through to you.

As you should know by now, I work for myself and have never worked for or on behalf of anyone from the laser vision correction industry.  

Judging by your antipathy towards OE and Moulsdale in particular, I guess that you have either worked for OE or otherwise been personally involved with Moulsdale.  If working for OE how do you reconcile working for a company that profits at the expense of ruined eyesight?

Condensed version of a post that was deleted.

Reply in relation to anons observations regarding moral fibre in these types of company.

Junior professionals cannot be controlled by senior executives, but can be by a layer of management who are similarly registered professionals.

In effect a hundred junior professionals can be made compliant by having just 2 or 3 senior professionals who accept the responsibility of passing on the sentiment of the board. Their professional responsibly is not dimmed by seniority and this layer of management has bought the company the ability to commercially manage professionals.  

Junior professionals who are conflicted and feel they are not being listened to may utilise the whistleblower policy is the company has one. Otherwise if the company is registered with a regulatory body a fitness to practice complaint can be made.

You should know -ur probably paid by moulsdale to type here everyday .

With your' dedication 'I'm surprised you aren't an editor for a major paper - not freelancing with hope to write something a paper wants to buy
.

Very suspicious.

8 Jan 2013
@Insider Sasha has even posted your comment on her website! Just goes to show how delusional she is.


Insider replies to reading with interest
8 Jan 2013
I know, she is a complete spanner

Wondering replies to reading with interest
8 Jan 2013
You must be very very stressed by my posts - why are you do stressed when they have apparently got nothing to do with you ?

________________________________________________

Has one of you given away who you are on page 83

"They wrote to my solicitor to say the clinic where I had my op changed its name from Optical Express Southern to 123 Leeds Ltd and falls under the Optical Express company - but 123 Leeds Ltd is now in administration! "

1. The company has undergone a number of name changes before it was renamed 123 Leeds Ltd:

https://www.duedil.com/company/01873281/123-leeds-limited

DATE CHANGED    PREVIOUS NAME
31 Jan 1985    Tudortime Public Limited Company
26 Sep 1988    Specialeyes Public Limited Company
23 May 1997    Specialeyes Plc
26 Sep 2012    Optical Express (Southern) Limited

2. The parent company is known as Dcm (Optical Holdings) Limited:

https://www.duedil.com/company/01873281/123-leeds-limited

NAME              RELATIONSHIP
SC146610            Dcm (Optical Holdings) Limited    Parent
( see https://www.duedil.com/company/SC146610/dcm-optical-holdings-limited )

3. The administrators are (from http://www.london-gazette.co.uk/issues/60295/notices/1685458 )
Joint Administrators' Names and Addresses:
Bryan A Jackson and Anne Buchanan (IP No 5194, 9302) of PKF (UK) LLP, 78 Carlton Place, Glasgow G5 9TH; and Ian Christopher Schofield (IP No 2647) of PKF (UK) LLP, 10 South Parade, Leeds LS1 5QS
Further information about this case is available from the offices of PKF (UK) LLP on 0141 429 5900

4. Sue them through the small claims process (check how much compensation you're claiming):
http://www.courtsni.gov.uk/en-GB/Services/Onl ... spx#smallclaims

5. Ask the Insolvency Service for advice and also lodge a complaint with them about the company:
http://www.insolvencydirect.bis.gov.uk/IES/companiesInvestigations.htm
Email: Intelligence.live@insolvency.gsi.gov.uk     Investigations Hotline: 0845 601 3546
Complaint form: http://www.insolvencydirect.bis.gov.uk/complaintformcib.htm

Other useful pages are:
http://www.dellam.com/cgi-bin/main.pl?web=yes&foundnumber=01873281
http://data.companieshouse.gov.uk/doc/company/01873281
http://opencorporates.com/companies/gb/01873281
http://www.companiesintheuk.co.uk/find?q=LS1+5QS

The above information is all freely available within the public domain so one may just need to spank the lawyers involved, although given that some charge by the hour, involving the media may accelerate matters.
Google the broadsheets "money questions" editor's contact details.

Good luck!

"At the back of the clinic, fire doors doubled as the deliveries door, which opened out into the service yard. These were seen to have been wedged open by a member of staff who had gone outside to smoke."

Wedged open? Is that the same wedge employed by the surgeon to hold open the eyelids during surgery?

Wondering replies to Anon (the original)
8 h 4 min ago
You should know -ur probably paid by moulsdale to type here everyday .

With your' dedication 'I'm surprised you aren't an editor for a major paper - not freelancing with hope to write something a paper wants to buy

Very suspicious.
____________________________________________________________________________________

I continue to post here, because I don't like bullies and this thread had been taken over by people intent on smothering any comment that was not directly in line with their private agenda.

Editor is not regarded as promotion by a lot of journalists and certainly not by me.  I prefer to write my own features, not manage every one elses.  

You haven't answered my question as to why you are so set against OE and Moulsdale in particular.  Ex employee, more personal or both?

Why won't you post what you have written so far on your article. ?

I doubt anyone on this forum believes you could possibly be a journalist and until I am fully satisfied yih are not lying I don't see why I should answer any of your questions. .

And if you are a journalist why haven't you posted your real name and contact details so people can get in touch with you? Surely a real journalist would do that. - otherwise how can anyone who may want to help you with your article communicate with you ?

As a so called journalist you are not looking particularly professional from my point of view !

How can a journalist possibly be trying to collate information and responders in a forum when they do not provide their real name or real contact details ? You could be anyone !