08702202020

Report a phone call from 08702202020 and help to identify who and why is calling from this number.
  • 0
    Sick replies to OMG
    | 1 reply
    Optical Express desperate to disassociate themselves from Patrick James Green have invented a new one & flooded the internet with the Stepford model!!!!!!!

    http://www.patrickjamesgreen.com/

    And more...
    https://soundcloud.com/patrick-james-green
    http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCiKHNZdJLUIfzTBkZ5l50Gw
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/discussion/user/id/11460127
    http://vimeo.com/patrickjamesgreen
    https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/pdp/profile/AVJFQ1DZ5B4FU?ie=UTF8&ref_=ya__56

    & more if you look...

    Moulsdale must want to keep him on board real bad to have gone to these lengths!

    Photo of the real Patrick James Green here!
    http://www.opticalexpressruinedmylife.co.uk/i ... ames-green.html

    Andrew Elphick is dead so PJG had dinner with a ghost & his non existent wife!

    Impressive effort OE!
  • 0
    Ismellanoerat
    | 2 replies
    It is a blight on the medical profession that this type of commercial surgery is allowed.
  • 0
    Alice replies to Ismellanoerat
    | 1 reply
    it's a dog eat dog world
  • 0
    Wondering replies to Alice
    Summary of
    Views and comments from forum on David Moulsdale- the owner of Optical Express

    1. He has no interest in the wellbeing of his workforce, which is why he abuses his position of trust as an employer to prey on and get involved with young females (employees) through lies , hires multiple bedrooms at his Optical Express Christmas parties and gets his PA to pick up for him. ( as Alleged by 'EX' a commentor on this forum )- I think he therefore demonstrates his attitude towards the the duty of care he has towards his employees.

    Another commentor called ' Chang ' has dubbed David Moulsdale the ' Jimmy Saville of the eye world '

    2. Someone anonymous  called 'ex' has written on this forum , insinuating that David Moulsdale is using drugs.It is rumoured previous to this that Moulsdale has been using cocaine according to 'speechless.'

    3.He is so interested in the best standards of eye care that he (as Sasha Rodoy alleges) has offered a government campaigner a bribe- in contravention to the bribery act and the law, not to campaign for government legislation in laser eye- surely the better option was to work with her?

    4. In Personnel Today 2005 it was reported as follows

    'Optical Express/The Dental Clinic has been accused of managing its staff badly and ignoring employment regulations. Personnel Today has received a letter from a source close to the company detailing a number of questionable employment practices - all of which have been denied by the management.'

    5. David Moulsdale been reported in the papers to have affiliations with a well known scottish gangster.

    6. He seems to have no problem with removing feedback about him from the internet (eg this forum, ex staff of optical express facebook pages and wikipedia) so and trying to inimidate people to not be involved in saying anything negative about him- probably so he can drag more people into his fantasist life of no consequences. (The ex staff of Optical Express had nearly 200 members with mainly negative feedback which has now been removed from the Internet )

    7.  David Moulsdale has had his company offer complaining customers refunds - allegedly( Orml info) only when they sign a gagging order stopping them from telling others about their experience. see opticalexpressruinedmylife.co.uk

    8. some customers who have struggled to get refunds and or compensation have written testimonies on opticalexpressruinedmylife.co.uk-

    9. There are comments on this forum suggesting people feel intimidated by Moulsdale eg .'bob etc'

    10. Moulsdale has borrowed heavily from RBS (to make his millions) which has been bailed out by taxpayers to run a business which has recently caused an 80 store subsidary go into administration and job losses, causing tensions with landlords as reported in the Telegraph.OE was accused of shutting shop before the rent was due .

    11.  in 2007 Optical Express became engaged in a dispute with HMRC . This was over a disputed 10.9 million pounds in taxes.

    12. Optical Express has been reported in the Which magazine as being the worst performing optical chain

    13. Optical Express were featured on tv programme Watchdog which sent undercover  customers into their stores. They accused OpticalExpress of providing misleading information to customers and underplaying risks of laser eye surgery .

    14. http://www.scotsman.com/news/scottish-news/to ... te-eye-1-505593

    A snippet of the article as can be seen published on the Scotman website.

    'The "financial bother" mentioned in court referred to his company’s failure to settle some of its debts on time. Mr Moulsdale, who lives in Dullater, near Cumbernauld, had been accused of building up his fortune at the expense of companies which were kept waiting for payment and Optical Express was the subject of a number of adverse court judgments.'

    15. According to the Herald Scotland Optical Express posted losses of 1.5 million last year for 2011 -

    16.It is likely that posters on this forum such as 'Anon' , 'readingwithinterest', and 'insider' and other potential aliases write on this forum to protect David Moulsdale's interests.

    17. A recent poster 'Marion' wrote this post on whocallsme with reference to optical express

    'The company is a discrace and truly lowest of the low and the dirty sleezy drug fuelled Hugh Kerr and David moulesdale are to blame for the life's they have ruined over the years!'
  • 0
    Sounds familiar
    | 1 reply
  • 0
    Wondering replies to Sounds familiar
    So the story basically says that Optical Express messed a custimer about for a 600.00 refund for months ? ??

    I've seen lots of issues  with people trying to get refunds from
    OE written about online  .


    Maybe David Moulsdale needed the money . After all his business was kind of collapsing wasn't it ?
    Moulsdale - I'm surprised you pay your staff sometimes .i wonder if  you would hang on to that too if you could .

    I think you are disgraceful .
  • 0
    True replies to Sick
    No that's someone trying to keep the Internet alive with pjg info - most of it is a dig at him - they've done their homework on him and saved his old videos etc - their being quite clever in keeping online awash with info on him and linking him elphick etc - that is someone trying to unhinge him and with an axe to grind...
  • 0
    Ismellanoerat
    | 2 replies
    http://blog.cloudmark.com/2012/08/06/optical-express-sms-spam/
    David Moulsdale will be unhappy with this wee lassie in the press office.
  • 0
    Wondering replies to Ismellanoerat
    | 1 reply
    Summary of
    Views and comments from forum on David Moulsdale- the owner of Optical Express

    1. He has no interest in the wellbeing of his workforce, which is why he abuses his position of trust as an employer to prey on and get involved with young females (employees) through lies , hires multiple bedrooms at his Optical Express Christmas parties and gets his PA to pick up for him. ( as Alleged by 'EX' a commentor on this forum )- I think he therefore demonstrates his attitude towards the the duty of care he has towards his employees.

    Another commentor called ' Chang ' has dubbed David Moulsdale the ' Jimmy Saville of the eye world '

    2. Someone anonymous  called 'ex' has written on this forum , insinuating that David Moulsdale is using drugs.It is rumoured previous to this that Moulsdale has been using cocaine according to 'speechless.'

    3.He is so interested in the best standards of eye care that he (as Sasha Rodoy alleges) has offered a government campaigner a bribe- in contravention to the bribery act and the law, not to campaign for government legislation in laser eye- surely the better option was to work with her?

    4. In Personnel Today 2005 it was reported as follows

    'Optical Express/The Dental Clinic has been accused of managing its staff badly and ignoring employment regulations. Personnel Today has received a letter from a source close to the company detailing a number of questionable employment practices - all of which have been denied by the management.'

    5. David Moulsdale been reported in the papers to have affiliations with a well known scottish gangster.

    6. He seems to have no problem with removing feedback about him from the internet (eg this forum, ex staff of optical express facebook pages and wikipedia) so and trying to inimidate people to not be involved in saying anything negative about him- probably so he can drag more people into his fantasist life of no consequences. (The ex staff of Optical Express had nearly 200 members with mainly negative feedback which has now been removed from the Internet )

    7.  David Moulsdale has had his company offer complaining customers refunds - allegedly( Orml info) only when they sign a gagging order stopping them from telling others about their experience. see opticalexpressruinedmylife.co.uk

    8. some customers who have struggled to get refunds and or compensation have written testimonies on opticalexpressruinedmylife.co.uk-

    9. There are comments on this forum suggesting people feel intimidated by Moulsdale eg .'bob etc'

    10. Moulsdale has borrowed heavily from RBS (to make his millions) which has been bailed out by taxpayers to run a business which has recently caused an 80 store subsidary go into administration and job losses, causing tensions with landlords as reported in the Telegraph.OE was accused of shutting shop before the rent was due .

    11.  in 2007 Optical Express became engaged in a dispute with HMRC . This was over a disputed 10.9 million pounds in taxes.

    12. Optical Express has been reported in the Which magazine as being the worst performing optical chain

    13. Optical Express were featured on tv programme Watchdog which sent undercover  customers into their stores. They accused OpticalExpress of providing misleading information to customers and underplaying risks of laser eye surgery .

    14. http://www.scotsman.com/news/scottish-news/to ... te-eye-1-505593

    A snippet of the article as can be seen published on the Scotman website.

    'The "financial bother" mentioned in court referred to his company’s failure to settle some of its debts on time. Mr Moulsdale, who lives in Dullater, near Cumbernauld, had been accused of building up his fortune at the expense of companies which were kept waiting for payment and Optical Express was the subject of a number of adverse court judgments.'

    15. According to the Herald Scotland Optical Express posted losses of 1.5 million last year for 2011 -

    16.It is likely that posters on this forum such as 'Anon' , 'readingwithinterest', and 'insider' and other potential aliases write on this forum to protect David Moulsdale's interests.

    17. A recent poster 'Marion' wrote this post on whocallsme with reference to optical express

    'The company is a discrace and truly lowest of the low and the dirty sleezy drug fuelled Hugh Kerr and David moulesdale are to blame for the life's they have ruined over the years!'
  • 0
    The pied piper replies to Wondering
    @Wondering
    Thank you

    If you know of any woman who is afraid to stand in front of a tyrant,
    a rapist, a violent lunatic then ask her to trust this fact: She will NOT be standing alone.

    Now is the time.
    http://www.rapecrisis.org.uk/Policeprocedure2.php
  • 0
    The truth
    Ann's Story

    One year prior to my surgery I attended Optical Express in Motherwell and was advised I was unsuitable for laser or RLE surgery.

    August 2010
    A friend was going for a consultation at Optical Express and suggested I went with her in case technology had moved on.

    Following an initial consultation at Optical Express East Kilbride store, I had Intra Ocular Lens (IOL) implanted in both eyes, a week apart, at Giffnock and Edinburgh clinics.

    I expected it would take a few weeks following surgery for things to settle, but it never did.

    I could see, but the quality of what I was seeing was poor and my sight was blurred, making everyday a struggle with headaches, tired streaming eyes, unable to see the computer at work clearly.

    I continued to present at East Kilbride, where the optometrist (Derek Hannan) repeatedly assured me, “your sight test is brilliant”. He gave me lubricating eye drops and advised to give it time.

    I was really struggling and found the whole situation immensely frustrating. I continued to present at EK clinic but again Derek would tell me “Brilliant… give it time”.

    December 2010
    This scenario continued until December, at which point I asked Derek for glasses as I just wanted my sight to be the way it was before. He told me I had very little prescription, but he would provide them for me.

    At that point I thought glasses would be the solution, but they made no difference at all.


    When I told him this, Derek’s reply was, “I don’t know why you can’t see with them”!

    January 2011
    I was referred for YAG treatment to both eyes after which my eyesight was still no better and I was increasingly frustrated by Derek Hannan only ever telling me how brilliant it was!

    August 2011
    I went to see another optom, Colin Berry, who tried to insert plugs into my tear ducts for dry eyes, but couldn’t get them in because the ducts were too small.

    He asked if I was experiencing glaring and ghosting – a term I’d never heard before – and as soon as he said the words, a lot of things fell into place. This was a turning point for me realizing that I wasn’t imagining my problems.

    September 2011
    I was sent for a second YAG procedure performed by David Teenan, who advised me that it was a “messy job” to try and remove the lenses as they’d been in for a year and would be difficult to remove.

    January 2012
    Like so many others with problems I was sent to the “Waiting Room” (OE’s complex cases clinic in Harley Street) to see Professor Jan Venter who confirmed that it was not straightforward.

    He told me to go away and think about further surgery, advising that someone would call me in a week.

    April 2012
    I received no call and eventually called them and spoke with a very unpleasant man, David Mungall, asking if OE would pay the cost for me to see an independent consultant for a second opinion.

    David Mungall agreed to this and told me to make the necessary arrangements. When I asked about payment he told me to have the invoice sent to him and it would be paid.

    May 2012
    I saw a consultant ophthalmologist at Ross Hall Hospital in Glasgow who told me it was risky surgery, because they’d been in for a year a gel had formed around the lens which makes it difficult to remove. Worse, he advised me that there was an even greater risk because I have had Yag surgery on top of this not once, but twice.

    The Yag (Yttrium aluminium garnet) makes holes in the supportive capsule that secures the lens, making the whole procedure much more difficult because the supportive capsule is now very fragile, so if they try to take the lens out this support could collapse.

    He also advised me not to consider having it done at an Optical Express clinic due to it being a specialist procedure needing to be carried out in a controlled environment, i.e. NHS operating theatre.

    Telling him what the consultant had advised, David Teenan told me he himself would not be happy to do this surgery. He also agreed that the NHS consultant would be better doing this procedure as he was a specialist and it would be performed more safely on NHS premises.

    December 2012
    I contacted Sasha Rodoy at My Beautiful Eyes advisory service looking for help.

    She put me in touch with a top solicitor in Scotland (he represents other Optical Express patients) and I am now taking legal action.

    January 2013
    My GP recently referred me to the NHS consultant where I was advised my options are limited, with complications too risky because of the YAG procedures.

    There is a common thread running through all the stories posted here!


    People are fobbed off, told to give more time, sent to Harley Street, etc… etc… and before you know it the 3 years are up in which to try and do something about it legally.

    To add insult to injury, a message on my answer phone last week from OE telling me I was due for my annual check up!

    Optical Express have left me with a condition that I did not have before surgery and there is NOTHING THAT CAN BE DONE TO RECTIFY IT.

    These people must be stopped. As a healthcare professional myself I am governed by the NMC. This consultant and these optometrists must have a governing body.

    I am currently looking into this and will leave any information on the OERML Forum.

    I will update my story when my legal case progresses..

    NB:
    The consultant I saw at Ross Hall Hospital in May has still not been paid by Optical Express despite several reminders.
  • 0
    Reading with disinterest
    Seems Russell Ambrose is playing "both ends against the middle".  You can end up getting burnt doing that Russ.

    Obviously 2013 is going to be a lot more significant  for the "Eye Laser Industry" than 2012.  Who will survive, whom will perish, will the administrators become busier???  

    Will justice finally prevail for Andrew Elphick?  

    Will 2013 signal the beginning of the end.
    • Caller: GetaFuckinLife
  • 0
    Sasha & Optimax
    | 19 replies
    Just so you misinformed cretins know, Sasha meets with Russell Ambrose every week to discuss problem patients, work out compensation and the like.

    Phone Russel if you need the confirmation.  Don't give me this [***] that she sold out Optimax problem cases after she received her own pay-out.

    Optical Express won't do the same, chiefly because they have too many problem patients, doing so would drive what remains of their business to the wall.

    optimaxruiningmylife,com
    opticalexpressruinedmylife.co.uk
    sasharodoyruiningtheeyelaserbusinessintheuk.co.uk
  • 0
    Muso replies to Sasha & Optimax
    | 18 replies
    More accurately, they meet to discuss how to further her smear campaign against OE. This has never been about helping patients. Her eyes are not damaged, she did not deserve the compensation she received. She has purposely upset patients, she lacks integrity.
  • 0
    Hope at last replies to Muso
    | 1 reply
    The only ones lacking in integrity are the businesses/clinics/individuals that have ruined peoples most precious sense for financial gain !
  • 0
    Muso replies to Hope at last
    I don't disagree that these businesses are awful. But I do have to object to how Sasha has treated several patients poorly.

    It is good that you personally feel helped by her, but you cannot even tell us what she has done to help you, it looks rather suspicious.
  • 0
    Sasha & Optimax replies to Muso
    | 15 replies
    Your WRONG Fool, hurting OE hurts them all including Optimax.  

    Optimax want to hush Sasha up as much as OE do, because it is reflecting on the entire industry, don't be so bloody stupid
  • 0
    reading-with-interest replies to Sasha & Optimax
    | 14 replies
    Optimax have already silenced Sasha with their blood money. If Sasha is so hell bent on helping Optimax patients then please do tell us why the ORML(Optimax ruined my life) website and ORML twitter feed were shut down? No I thought not
  • 0
    reading-with-interest replies to reading-with-interest
    | 13 replies
    @Sasha and Optimax the only stupid one is you if you can't see that Sasha is using OE patients the same as she used Optimax patients. Seriously if Sasha wanted to help Optimax patients she wouldn't have closed down the ORML website which she promised numerous times publicly that she would never do. More and more people are seeing through this farce of a woman.
  • 0
    reading-with-interest replies to reading-with-interest
    | 11 replies
    @sasha and Optimax if what you claim is true why in the hell is Sasha talking to Russell Ambrose about what compensation payouts should be???? Am I missing the part where Sasha is a trained lawyer or a trained Opthamologist? She's a failed market trader for crying out loud she has no business whatsoever being involved in people's compensation talks if what you say is true(which I doubt).

Submit a comment about 08702202020 phone number:

The company that called you.
 
Other phone numbers that starts with 087