01427858331

Apologies, "Notorious" is me on a forum i have just left, no attempt to decieve, just keyboard banging.

Nan Thankyou for your comments. Don't feel disheartened, we too do not agree with the removal of posts as new readers are not aware of the whole conversation and it's unfortunate that they don't see the cunning side of the Express Law and the lengths that they will go to.

However, we will keep going as this forum is working. There have been many clients that have come forward to wewillgivefreeadvice@hotmail.co.uk that don't wish to post on here due to reprisals.

Thankyou for reading.

KW

Thanks for that.  Interesting that the post just up from yours was not put on by me!!.  I have no intention of going anywhere, but I will be reporting that post.  If the Moderators are going to remove posts then perhaps they can start with those which need to be removed.

Pardon?

If the messages are copied/pasted from other threads, the discussion becomes difficult to read, it would be better if you could just link to the post or the page with the post of interest.

We welcome your investigation and we are glad to play a role in it. As you know the website allows posting without registration, which is great because there are more people wiling to share their experience and information without having to spend time of creating accounts. The drawback is we have more spam and more people trying to game the system. That's why we have a few rules in place that we observe and enforce. Again, if we remove posts, we have a reason for it.

And the last thing, when you copy/paste articles from other sites, and we receive a DMCA notice (copyright claim), we remove the entire post.

As i thought really.
Dissapointing.

if you register an account THEN no other registered user will be able to claim/post under your nickname. Imagine people trying to post anonymously as "Julia" and getting an error "this nickname is already in use". That's disappointing.

With the greatest of respect, i registered and the result was a little more than "Dissapointing".
Maybe you know what i mean?

No I don't. If you have any feedback please shoot me an email through the contact us page. Now, I apologize for this off topic discussion, if you have any questions or concerns please email instead.

Fake Deepthroat (Express Law) Thankyou for your comments:

"I would like to offer my deepest apologies to express law. I received a call yesterday evening and we have got it wrong. They are offering free advice with the option to take on their services if you wish to. They call everybody over the age of 18 so it isn't targeted at elderly.

Once again apologies express law. I was getting involved slandering your company and I did not have the true facts."
                                                 -------------------------------------
A.B very funny

If these are the lengths that you have to go to, to prove to readers that you are doing nothing wrong, then it is a sorry state of affairs. Rest assured, readers can see through your attempts.

Thankyou for reading.

KW

Seen as i made one post at 5pm today i seem to have a little prolific crooked helper here.

Fake posts will be busted before this day is out.
Mark me!

To all Readers - Estate Planning & Trust information:

There are good trusts and there are bad trusts. Good trusts are part of a process used by legitimate estate planners and their clients to control the disposition of assets, avoid probate, reduce administration costs, save estate taxes, and preserve family wealth for future generations. This article is not about the good trusts. It is about bad trusts.

Companies that churn out “standard” living trusts or any other kind of trusts sell their services in seminars, and by telesales without any concern for your overall estate plan, these companies often try to sell you a trust in a “one-size-fits-all” package. This can have a detrimental affect on your estate plan and may result in the transfer of property to the wrong heirs, while costing you a great deal of money in preparing the trust agreement, in some cases, more than £2000, although this is even above the odds.

In most cases, such companies purport to use the services of an Solicitor, but usually, the Solicitor is only a front man for the company and does not play any part in the creation of your estate plan or trust. Also, such companies often make false claims about the benefits of a trust, in particular, they exaggerate the beneficial effect of a trust when it comes to asset protection,
Deceptive trust companies can be spotted in a number of ways:

They often sell trusts through seminars or through telesales offering free advice with arranged home visits, without giving you any way to check the credentials of the sales person or company. When they visit you at your home they may remove paperwork, leaving you with very little to look at or investigate.

Watch out for “sound alike” names confusing their services.

FINAL WORDS OF ADVICE – Any trust should be created only after a thorough review of your tax, estate, and personal goals. You need to talk with a team of professionals perhaps an accountant or financial advisor to make an informed decision on whether to create a trust.

You can’t take it with you and you can’t change your mind, so draw up a professional will and trust.

Thankyou for reading.

KW

C'mon, some try to impersonate me again.
   
What are you waiting for?

Someone*

Even.

Deepthroat, out of curiosity we looked up the meaning of your name, interesting to say the least. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_Throat   
     
Oh and btw they won't come back atm, as they have a point to make that they have all got lives, also better things to do on a bank holiday, such as spend spend spend their big wage packets.
       
Thankyou for reading.

KW

Heh!  
       
I have no such illusions of grandeur (sp?)


If there is a deepthroat here it is surely you, and i mean in the Woodward and berstein way.
I am merely a person who has not tried to hide his identity at all.
Unlike the ID thieving stealing gits that have recently tried to overcome us.  
I believe i linked my nick to the washington post rather than the movie long before this.

Fake Deepthroat (Express Law) Thankyou for the below comments:

"After all bank holiday weekend sat on this forum it is just not worth it any more. Express law are just to good! And also even kw can see I think I'm something I'm not. Just a loner behind a screen. I hate my life."

We can confirm that you are not the original 'deepthroat' poster. To discredit people on this forum, may appear to be a good idea to you, however, all readers can see through your attempts.

Truly Pathetic.

Thankyou for reading.

KW

To all Readers, we can confirm that the below comment, is not the original 'deepthroat' poster:

"Actually the ips are different because I have different computers! Leave express law alone! I'm righting my wrongs...sorry express law. And sorry to all the hard workers that are helping people protect their homes from the community care act!"

Fake Deepthroat, it's not by your IP address that we know your not the original. Try again.

Thankyou for reading.

KW

To all Readers, please be sure that you are protecting your assets correctly. Go to a reputable Solicitor or Professional Will Writer within the IPW.

Deprivation of capital
If you give away your property or savings deliberately in order to avoid paying for your care home costs, this is called ‘deprivation of capital’. The Department for Work and Pensions and the council are entitled to take account of this capital as if it were still owned by you, and can seek to make you pay the care home fees accordingly.

Some of the ways in which you may be considered to have deprived yourself of capital include:
*Giving away money
*Transferring the ownership of property, or
*Spending your capital on something not necessary, for example, an expensive painting.

Both the Department for Work and Pensions and the council must look at your reasons for giving the capital away and when you gave it away. For example, if you gave each of your grandchildren some money three years before you needed care, it may be unreasonable for the council to assume that you gave the money away in order to avoid paying care home fees. However, if you signed your property over to your son two weeks before you went into a care home, the council might decide that you did so in order to avoid having to pay the care home fees.

There is no time-limit on how far back the council can look at what they consider to be ‘deliberate’ deprivation of capital.

For more information on the above, please contact the DWP or your local council. Don't be fooled into making a costly error in having it protected, only to have it taken away after all. It's imperative that you receive the correct advice.

Thankyou for reading.

KW