01516680386

Report a phone call from 01516680386 and help to identify who and why is calling from this number.
  • 0
    Reply in bold replies to Knock Knock
    Yep his 4 o levels were true..
  • 0
    What??? replies to hang on
    | 10 replies
    I mean updates with credible information. Sorry but the 14 million pound valuation, using Storefirst's own figures , a firm the trustee is in dispute with is stretching credibility to the limits. Well all we can do is wait.
  • 0
    Reply in bold replies to What???
    | 9 replies
    What would you suggest the trustees do next
  • 0
    Valuations replies to Reply in bold
    How about appointing a valuer?
  • 0
    Postmastergeneral replies to Reply in bold
    | 7 replies
    Get an independent accountant/auditor in,all they are doing is digging a big hole for themselves and making it obvious this is a coverup
  • 0
    Reply in bold replies to Postmastergeneral
    | 5 replies
    10/10 expected that .
    Now, I would issue a stat demand for the 1.6 mill as per contract  if Storefirst say they've paid then they would have to disclose who they paid as they could have winding up procedures start and that would not be good for reputation .If they pay up , my thoughts only, who are they protecting
  • 0
    Postmastergeneral replies to Reply in bold
    | 4 replies
    agree, most people would issue a stat demand for a couple of grand let alone 1.6m so why havent imperial done this? seems to me the answer is simple ie imperial were part of the theft
  • 0
    Reply in bold replies to Postmastergeneral
    You have to exhaust all avenues first, and who says they haven't , the letter states instructed legal proceedings
  • 0
    Anon replies to Postmastergeneral
    Do not get confused with imperial mark one from September 12 until august14 and then imperial mark two from October 14 to date ,totally different people with totally different aims .
  • 0
    knock knock replies to Postmastergeneral
    | 2 replies
    So are you saying if this has been done then they are not part of the theft ?
  • 0
    Reply in bold replies to knock knock
    So if they have done this, then they are looking after the members interest and also trying to expose the real criminals behind Itsl
  • 0
    Reply in bold replies to knock knock
    And we're still waiting for the reply over the missing 1.2 mill ,bank statements and Bill Perkins Twitter account. THEY DONT EXIST SAME AS WILD CONSPIRACY THEORIES
  • 0
    puzzled mate
    | 7 replies
    Sure he will like that my mate puzzled!!
  • 0
    Reply in bold replies to puzzled mate
    | 6 replies
    Don't think his mum knows what he's been up to, told him to make it private but what do you tell your mum when she thinks your a successful business man and not a  scammer . Girlfriend soon closed hers nough said about her morals  .
  • 0
    Miffed replies to Reply in bold
    | 5 replies
    Isn't Hadley Angie's mate?
  • 0
    Hadley replies to Miffed
    | 4 replies
    Who knows? This issue gets wheeled out regularly, rather than what steps are being taken to value the pods. Is Hadley stopping that from happening?
  • 0
    fox replies to Hadley
    | 3 replies
    Who knows that either.
    He is hardly assisting with the process at best
  • 0
    Hadley replies to fox
    | 2 replies
    I would hope he has no part whatsoever in the process.
  • 0
    fox replies to Hadley
    | 1 reply
    by that i mean his co operation and information may well be vital in obtaining valuations or even finding 1.6 and any associated commissions but that doesn't seem forthcoming
  • 0
    At the risk of stating the obvious replies to fox
    If this guy is complicit in the missing money why would he cooperate unless forced to by law?

Submit a comment about 01516680386 phone number:

The company that called you.
 
Other phone numbers that starts with 015