01516680386
Report a phone call from 01516680386 and help to identify who and why is calling from this number.
- Housekeeping replies to /////Phone number on web page still is, it's Storefirst investment tel number. Lots of brochures to change ...
- ::::::: replies to Bianca| 7 repliesAs long as the 'Mitchell' brothers get there dues, it will impact on the others when they have no pods to sell
- Hot Frog replies to :::::::| 6 repliesLink here which links back to Website, SF address & same Tel No
http://www.hotfrog.co.uk/Companies/National-Pension-Review-Centre - ????? replies to Hot Frog| 5 repliesHow can a company file dormant accounts but be actively trading?
- ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, replies to ?????| 4 repliesWhat company are you referring to ?
- ??? replies to ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,| 3 repliesNPR (UK) LTD company reg 08756924
Postcode BB12 7NG
Tel No 01282 330330
http://www.effectus-npr.com
Same Postcode & tel No as this lot
http://www.s1.co.uk/contact/ - ????? replies to ???| 2 repliesNpr UK ltd...filing dormant accounts but up until last week had a very active website and also active for business through other forms of advertising
- ??? replies to ?????| 1 replyYear end not due till Oct 15.
A change of accounting date applied for 30-7-15 ??? - ????? replies to ???Looks like they will be final accounts
- Paul Tpiu.north@Insolvency.gsi.gov.uk
The email address to send to in order to register your interest in any of the assets of Capita Oak..name and address ..
Maybe of a benefit going forward should meetings and appointments take place - Dylan Harveythought it might be good for you to see what the investors from the Dylan Harvey scam had to go through to try get their money back:
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9076 ... 98095761&bpli=1
because the blog was british toby whaittaker was able to have a lot of information removed, and the famous Lawrence Whittaker took the time to comment... guess who was working there? Ruth Almond!! - ANK1| 3 replies
- Paul T replies to ANK1| 2 replieshttp://m.ft.com/cms/s/0/8eb1c172-3781-11e5-b05b-b01debd57852.html
Not sure if this gets you there quicker Ank - 16% replies to Paul T| 1 replySee toby is quoted as saying 16% was commission paid to Transeuro and knows nothing of 'missing' 1.6 mill.
- ANK1| 5 repliesCar parking spaces at London’s Gatwick airport are being sold as investments for £25,000 each to pension savers in the latest bizarre alternative investment to be marketed since April’s retirement revolution.
Agents are marketing Park First, an unregulated scheme promising a “guaranteed” 8 per cent yield for at least two years, to UK savers who have become a magnet for both mainstream and high-risk investment sales since gaining new freedoms in using their pension savings.
There is just one problem: Park First’s sister company, Store First, was involved with pension schemes that paid almost 50 per cent commissions out of investors’ money and left them at least £1.6m out of pocket, according to the Insolvency Service, a government agency.
Park First says it can offer retail investors the chance to buy an individual parking space at Gatwick — an opportunity “no longer just for the super-rich”. “You will receive a 25 per cent rise in capital growth from day one on the asset value,” publicity materials claim.
Its offer comes at a time when low yields in equity and bond markets are tempting many investors into exotic asset classes, and when government reforms have freed pensioners from the obligation to buy annuities.
Dale Mills, a health service worker, invested a lump sum from his pension in Park First, through “introducer” company PCG Invest. “I felt comfortable I wasn’t throwing money into a black hole. You own the title deed, and whatever happens no one can take that away from you,” he said.
Darren Brown, chief executive of PCG Invest, concedes not all may be as it seems. “Park First are offering to relist the land you’re buying at 25 per cent over what you paid for it, but whether or not they sell it is another matter,” he said.
There is no liquid market — indeed, there is probably no market whatsoever — for the sale of airport car parking spaces
- Tim Wixted, of law firm Neglect Assist
Tim Wixted, of the law firm Neglect Assist, said: “There is no liquid market — indeed, there is probably no market whatsoever — for the sale of airport car parking spaces.” He said the two-year guaranteed teaser rate smacked of a scheme that is “doomed to fail”.
In the case of Store First, the Insolvency Service said that people were cold-called and persuaded to transfer their savings into two pension schemes, where the money would be placed into storage pods. But Store First then paid commissions of up to 46 per cent to another company, the service said after shutting down the trustees of the pension schemes.
Toby Whittaker, director of Park First and Store First, said: “Neither I, nor any of my companies, has anything to do with setting up the two [pension] schemes or administering them”. He said “commissions” amounting to 16 per cent were paid to an agent, Transeuro, which placed the order for storage pods on behalf of the pension schemes.
“I know nothing about £1.6m supposedly being ‘missing’,” he added.
The Serious Fraud Office has carried out preliminary interviews about the pension schemes that held Store First’s pods, according to a campaign group for investors. The SFO said it could not confirm or deny this.
Only £13.4m of a total £19.4m in these schemes was ever invested in storage units, and the High Court heard that “the guaranteed 8 per cent return on investment had not been received by either of the schemes and that an estimated £1.6m was missing”. Mr Whittaker denied knowing how much was originally invested.
Park First says that investors receive a certificate of ownership, while the space will be leased back and managed by a parking company. Investors must buy a £20,000 parking space at Glasgow airport before they can access Gatwick spaces.
Park First “looks modelled on the many foreign land and storage pods schemes we deal with that have lost pensioners thousands,” said Mr Wixted.
Because the scheme involves individual plots of land, it operates outside Financial Conduct Authority regulations on collective investment schemes. But a landmark Court of Appeal judgment over an overseas land and carbon credit scheme in March may change that.
The court ruled that that scheme, Capital Alternatives, was in fact a collective investment scheme and should be subject to FCA rules. Lawyers say this may also apply to other schemes. - obviously replies to 16%TW@ will know nothing about the 1.6 mil it went in his back pocket
- Paul T replies to ANK1| 4 repliesThat's the way to sort the issue Ank..
- anon replies to Paul T| 3 repliesHigh quality global journalism requires investment. Please share this article with others using the link below, do not cut & paste the article. See our Ts&Cs and Copyright Policy for more detail. Email ftsales.support@ft.com to buy additional rights. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/8eb1c172-3781-11e5- ... l#ixzz3hlODNfvY
- Anon replies to anon| 2 repliesIf you don't want a copy of the article on here please contact the moderators and ask them to remove
- anon replies to Anon| 1 replyNo I want it out there as much as you, just highlighting the small print .. Which very often gets overlooked .
Submit a comment about 01516680386 phone number: