01516680386

What does this tell us ?

Well said Den, Karen..
As for the Data. Why don't you sue her Batman.  Should be enough to earn the perps a date with the High Court in London. The 'click and delete ' buttons have probably been working overtime in their offices now they know that we are on to them.

Assets of 620k, means its worth 20k.
So what .

No what is a matter of fact is we've had TEN MILLION POUNDS STOLEN from us..not slurs matters of fact..and Angie is uncovering more and more details leading us closer and closer to the perps..are you one? Why dig up crap about her? If you're so intent on showing the honest facts why don't you reveal who you are? why aren't YOU revealing who the perps are?And like what was said in an earlier post if you are sure she has data she shouldn't have...sue.. lets have a day in court..we know who we'll be supporting

I'm open minded and distrustful of everybody on here after all its basically anonymous I've said on previous post I'm paying no more money to anybody at all that includes Angie if she wants to take over the running that's fine by me but I won't be contributing anything towards it they have had enough off me I'm prepared to lose my 54k
I repeat I trust nobody

And I've nothing to hide I'm a genuine capita oak victim along with many other genuine people who have posted on here I know nothing about ANGIE and don't really want to to be honest

This thread needs to get back on track. I can understand why you would want to rubbish the credibility of anyone that wants to help the victims, we would expect nothing less.

Watch this and make up your own minds, in the interests of balance.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9oL1FZQZU8

The fact is that in the past few weeks the victims' cause has moved forward significantly.

Hang in there and keep the momentum.

1.    The law requires that trustees have knowledge and understanding of the law relating to pensions and trusts, as well as the principles relating to the funding of pension schemes and the investment of scheme assets. The law also requires trustees to be familiar with certain scheme documents including the trust deed and rules, the statement of investment principles and the statement of funding principles.  The trustee is responsible for the proper running of the scheme – from the collection of contributions, to the investment of assets and payment of benefits. The scheme members look to the trustee to make sure that the scheme is well run and that the members’ benefits are secure.

It would appear that far from being properly run by trustees who understood their legal responsibilities, Capita Oak had been run in a furtive and irresponsible manner by two “shadow directors” Bill Perkins and Alan Fowler.  The scheme had been set up as an occupational scheme with a “shell” sponsoring employer R. P. Medplant Limited in Cyprus.  Both Perkins and Fowler have close links to Stephen Ward who owns and runs Premier Pension Solutions in Spain and Premier Pension Transfers in the UK – both of which have a long history of operating pension liberation scams.  Perkins and Fowler appear to have used a variety of individuals as “front men” for their shadow directorships including (but not limited to) Karl Dunlop, Sarah Duffel and Christopher Payne.  Karl Dunlop was the original director of Imperial Trustees who resigned in Q1 2013; Christopher Payne was the original director of TKE Admin who fulfilled some sort of unknown administration role for Capita Oak, and charged £441k for their services; and Sarah Duffel is the current director of TKE who took over when Payne resigned in Q2 2014.  

After Karl Dunlop resigned as director of Imperial Trustees in Q1 2013, there was a period when there was no director at all.  However, in August a nominee director was appointed called Maria Orolfo.  Ms. Orolfo was an employee of Europe Emirates in Dubai and her UK address was actually a derelict property.  When it became clear she had inadvertently been coerced into acting as a director of a trustee company which had been operating a fraudulent scheme (when news of the assets of the scheme was announced in the media), Ms. Orolfo resigned in August 2014 and again there was no director of Imperial.

At this point, a number of Capita Oak members had joined the Ark Class Action which had originally been set up to represent the interests of the Ark members.  In the interest of the Capita Oak members, and in consultation with Companies House, I appointed myself as director of Imperial Trustees on 1.10.2014.  In the full knowledge that Christopher Payne had the Companies House pin number, was acting under the direction of Perkins and Fowler, and would remove me as soon as my appointment was publicised on the Companies House website, I took the decision to remove R. P. Medplant as sponsoring employer and also to remove Imperial as trustees.  I issued an interim, emergency, amended trust deed.  As predicted, on the orders of Perkins and Fowler, Payne duly removed me as a director on 13.10.2014.

In the past week, Metis Law have tried to impress upon Payne the importance of acting in the interests of the Capita Oak members, and have asked him to re-appoint me as a director of Imperial to avoid the possibility of court delays and costs to clarify my role as trustee.  However, Payne has declined upon the advice of an accountant, Brian Downs, who is clearly in communication with Perkins and Fowler.

2.    An employer, or group of employers, can choose to set up an occupational pension scheme to provide pension and other benefits for their employees when they retire

The employer, R. P. Medplant Limited (Cyprus), does not appear on the Cyprus Companies House registry and therefore does not seem to exist – let alone have any employees.  Furthermore, R. P. Medplant was also used as the “sponsoring employer” for another pension liberation scheme: Westminster.  It is therefore reasonable to assume that R. P. Medplant was neither a genuine company nor a genuine sponsoring employer and was duly removed by me under the terms of the revised trust deed.

3.    A trustee is a person or company, acting separately from the employer, who holds assets in the trust for the beneficiaries of the scheme. Trustees are responsible for ensuring that the pension scheme is run properly and that members' benefits are secure.

It is clear that none of the Imperial “trustees” of Capita Oak have ever acted responsibly, in accordance with the law, or in the interests of the members and the security of their benefits.  The first trustee, Karl Dunlop, instructed Metis Law to invest 100% of the scheme’s funds in speculative, illiquid assets (Store First’s storage “pods”) without proper valuations and without securing the agreed rental income due to the scheme by the operators of Store First.  The second trustee, Maria Orolfo, lived in Dubai and had no idea she was ever even a trustee of a pension scheme, and the third trustee is Christopher Payne who has demonstrated no interest in the appalling predicament of the Capita Oak members and is in any event too profoundly under the control and influence of the shadow directors Perkins and Fowler to take any responsible actions in the members’ interests.

It is also clear that the previous trustees had no regard whatsoever to their duties to ensure prudent investment principles were strictly adhered to as laid down by the Pensions Regulator: “in a manner to ensure the security, quality, liquidity and profitability of the fund; having regard to the need for diversification in the choice of investments for the scheme; and making sure that the scheme assets are invested mainly in regulated markets”.

Bloody we'll said

I very much agree to

We'll said Ang I believe I speak for most people when I say thank you
That couldn't of been said any clearer for us all to see where the investment has gone
And how a bunch of muppets have managed to get us to where we are today

I was providing evidence that Angie Brooks was the controlling director of a company that has been closed by HMRC for running illegal gambling. 600 thousand pounds are missing from that company and it is thought that it is because the directors took "loans" out the company. This is the person that you think is championing your cause, the person that brushes this evidence aside by saying it is a slur. Do you not think it is strange that nobody is worried that this has happened ?

You were providing evidence that you don't do your research properly.  If I had time to publish a correction I would do so, but I have other priorities at the moment.  But thanks for trying to help the members anyway.

I understand totally where you are coming from Joe I too am a genuine CapitaOak victim and am frightened. .A word not used lightly...of putting trust in anyone...but you've got to put some trust in Angie otherwise you might as well honestly say 100% good bye to your pension money..If I'm wrong about her genuineness. .I DO NOT THINK I AM..then I will never trust again, not my judgement any way..I don't want to live like that. We truly have come so far down the line recently towards success that is why all this negativity about her has appeared on here, we are getting too close to them  for comfort and they are trying to turn us against her..they'll probably then if that doesn't work try and turn us against each other. There is a meeting on the 25th October email Angie for details. You can't do this alone..I can't believe how tangled their web of deceit is..you need someone who knows how to unpick it.

Exactly, why have they not come out of the woodwork before? Angie has not stolen money from us and any fees she has received have been paid voluntarily for a bloody fantastic service provided!!!!! Whereas our pension has been stolen, we were defrauded, told lies, scammed, by, I believe, the people that are trying to discredit Angie on here. Make no mistake, we will get you, one way or another we will pursue you relentlessly until we get resolution.

Stay open minded and trust no one I mean no one only time will tell who is genuine did we all not not trust capita oak at the beginning

ATTENTION MR. B. DOWNS, DOWNS & CO.

Dear Mr. Downs

I understand you sent out a letter to the Capita Oak members against my specific instructions on 21.10.2014.

The Capita Oak pension fund is most certainly not administered by Imperial Trustee Services (ITS) – nor has it ever been so since Christopher Payne incorporated the company on 6.7.2012.  Christopher Payne set up Imperial Trustee Services for the explicit purpose of establishing a trustee and administrator of the Capita Oak pension scheme which was set up fraudulently for pension liberation as an occupational scheme with a sponsoring employer called R. P. Medplant Limited in Cyprus which did not and does not appear on the Cyprus Companies House register.  There was at the time a clear conflict of interest, as Christopher Payne was also the sole director of TKE Admin which provided unspecified “administration” services to the Capita Oak scheme and charged fees of £441k during the short life of the scheme.

Christopher Payne resigned as a director of ITS on 18.10.2012 and left the company to a series of different, unqualified directors, none of whom took responsibility for the lawful, compliant and responsible trusteeship of the Capita Oak pension scheme, its members' interests and investments.  Christopher Payne then appointed himself as director of ITS at the behest of “shadow” directors Bill Perkins and Alan Fowler at the beginning of October 2014.  The previous director, Maria Orolfo (a nominee director based in Dubai) was not “incorrectly removed”, she resigned when she realised that Capita Oak pension scheme had been run fraudulently and negligently, and was not prepared to be left “holding the baby” once the law enforcement agencies caught up with those responsible.

CP appointed himself director of ITS on the instructions of the shadow directors BP and AF in October 2014.  However, ITS was removed as trustee and administrator by me as member-nominated trustee and director of ITS after I removed RPM as sponsoring employer due to the fraudulent, negligent and irresponsible nature of the scheme structure.



Kindly do not contact anyone until and unless instructed by me to do so.  Your firm and your client CP are both under suspicion and investigation at the moment and it is not appropriate for you to make contact with anyone without my express instructions.  I have already asked you not to do this, and as you have ignored my instructions I am making a formal complaint against you to your professional body.  You are aware that I have evidence that you personally have been in communication with the shadow directors Bill Perkins and Alan Fowler.

You are in no position to make any statements to any parties and have been specifically requested by me not to do any such thing.  If you receive any further communications from any parties regarding the affairs of Capita Oak you are to refer them directly to me or to Metis Law solicitors.

Should your unsolicited interference in this matter - against my explicit instructions - result in any loss, prejudice or delays to the work which is being carried out on behalf of the Capita Oak scheme and members by the correct, authorised parties, action will be taken against you and your firm and damages sought from you.

Regards, Angela Brooks - Chairman, Ark Class Action

1.    The law requires that trustees have knowledge and understanding of the law relating to pensions and trusts, as well as the principles relating to the funding of pension schemes and the investment of scheme assets. The law also requires trustees to be familiar with certain scheme documents including the trust deed and rules, the statement of investment principles and the statement of funding principles.  The trustee is responsible for the proper running of the scheme – from the collection of contributions, to the investment of assets and payment of benefits. The scheme members look to the trustee to make sure that the scheme is well run and that the members’ benefits are secure.

It would appear that far from being properly run by trustees who understood their legal responsibilities, Capita Oak had been run in a furtive and irresponsible manner by two “shadow directors” Bill Perkins and Alan Fowler.  The scheme had been set up as an occupational scheme with a “shell” sponsoring employer R. P. Medplant Limited in Cyprus.  Both Perkins and Fowler have close links to Stephen Ward who owns and runs Premier Pension Solutions in Spain and Premier Pension Transfers in the UK – both of which have a long history of operating pension liberation scams.  Perkins and Fowler appear to have used a variety of individuals as “front men” for their shadow directorships including (but not limited to) Karl Dunlop, Sarah Duffel and Christopher Payne.  Karl Dunlop was the original director of Imperial Trustees who resigned in Q1 2013; Christopher Payne was the original director of TKE Admin who fulfilled some sort of unknown administration role for Capita Oak, and charged £441k for their services; and Sarah Duffel is the current director of TKE who took over when Payne resigned in Q2 2014.  

After Karl Dunlop resigned as director of Imperial Trustees in Q1 2013, there was a period when there was no director at all.  However, in August a nominee director was appointed called Maria Orolfo.  Ms. Orolfo was an employee of Europe Emirates in Dubai and her UK address was actually a derelict property.  When it became clear she had inadvertently been coerced into acting as a director of a trustee company which had been operating a fraudulent scheme (when news of the assets of the scheme was announced in the media), Ms. Orolfo resigned in August 2014 and again there was no director of Imperial.

At this point, a number of Capita Oak members had joined the Ark Class Action which had originally been set up to represent the interests of the Ark members.  In the interest of the Capita Oak members, and in consultation with Companies House, I appointed myself as director of Imperial Trustees on 1.10.2014.  In the full knowledge that Christopher Payne had the Companies House pin number, was acting under the direction of Perkins and Fowler, and would remove me as soon as my appointment was publicised on the Companies House website, I took the decision to remove R. P. Medplant as sponsoring employer and also to remove Imperial as trustees.  I issued an interim, emergency, amended trust deed.  As predicted, on the orders of Perkins and Fowler, Payne duly removed me as a director on 13.10.2014.

In the past week, Metis Law have tried to impress upon Payne the importance of acting in the interests of the Capita Oak members, and have asked him to re-appoint me as a director of Imperial to avoid the possibility of court delays and costs to clarify my role as trustee.  However, Payne has declined upon the advice of an accountant, Brian Downs, who is clearly in communication with Perkins and Fowler.

2.    An employer, or group of employers, can choose to set up an occupational pension scheme to provide pension and other benefits for their employees when they retire

The employer, R. P. Medplant Limited (Cyprus), does not appear on the Cyprus Companies House registry and therefore does not seem to exist – let alone have any employees.  Furthermore, R. P. Medplant was also used as the “sponsoring employer” for another pension liberation scheme: Westminster.  It is therefore reasonable to assume that R. P. Medplant was neither a genuine company nor a genuine sponsoring employer and was duly removed by me under the terms of the revised trust deed.

3.    A trustee is a person or company, acting separately from the employer, who holds assets in the trust for the beneficiaries of the scheme. Trustees are responsible for ensuring that the pension scheme is run properly and that members' benefits are secure.

It is clear that none of the Imperial “trustees” of Capita Oak have ever acted responsibly, in accordance with the law, or in the interests of the members and the security of their benefits.  The first trustee, Karl Dunlop, instructed Metis Law to invest 100% of the scheme’s funds in speculative, illiquid assets (Store First’s storage “pods”) without proper valuations and without securing the agreed rental income due to the scheme by the operators of Store First.  The second trustee, Maria Orolfo, lived in Dubai and had no idea she was ever even a trustee of a pension scheme, and the third trustee is Christopher Payne who has demonstrated no interest in the appalling predicament of the Capita Oak members and is in any event too profoundly under the control and influence of the shadow directors Perkins and Fowler to take any responsible actions in the members’ interests.

It is also clear that the previous trustees had no regard whatsoever to their duties to ensure prudent investment principles were strictly adhered to as laid down by the Pensions Regulator: “in a manner to ensure the security, quality, liquidity and profitability of the fund; having regard to the need for diversification in the choice of investments for the scheme; and making sure that the scheme assets are invested mainly in regulated markets”.

Mr. Brian Downs                                        24 October 2014
Downs & Co Accountants
Imperial House, North Street
Bromley BR1 1SD

Dear Mr. Downs

CAPITA OAK PENSION SCHEME – IMPERIAL TRUSTEES

I remain deeply disappointed that you contacted all the Capita Oak members against my specific instructions and hereby inform you that I will be making a formal complaint against you to the ACCA today.  Naturally, you and all the Capita Oak members will be copied in.

Meanwhile, your client Christopher Payne remains liable and culpable for the Capita Oak members’ funds (and any losses and liabilities) as former trustee.  He is also in breach of trust law and may be subject to criminal proceedings as he was also responsible for operating pension liberation fraud.

It is a matter of record that Mr. Payne registered Imperial Trustee Services himself on 6 July 2012 and declared the registered office to be Phoenix Accounting, 78 Beckenham Road, Beckenham BR3 4RH and himself to be the sole director whose address was Langar, New Barn Road, Longfield, Kent DA3 7LG.  He also incorporated TKE Admin on 14 August 2012.  While Mr. Payne subsequently resigned from Imperial, he remained involved with the administration of Capita Oak throughout and has recently re-appointed himself as director of Imperial.  It is therefore indisputable that he remains 100% liable and culpable for all matters concerning Capita Oak.

I therefore require, by return, all records in the possession of Mr. Payne relating to all aspects of Capita Oak.  I further require a statement identifying all parties who were involved with the scheme – including the pension liberation fraud operated by Thurlstone Finance.  A full explanation is required as to why TKE Admin charged the scheme £441k – plus apparently a further £10k by Mr. Payne as “compensation for loss of business” when the Imperial bank account was closed.

Your client will also be required to repay the £441k to the scheme in full and his proposals for doing this at the earliest possible opportunity must be sent to me no later than Monday 27th October.  Failure to make acceptable repayment proposals, will result in legal action against Mr. Payne and TKE Admin for the recovery of this sum.  I suggest you advise your client to seek legal advice.

Yours faithfully

Angela Brooks
Chairman, Ark Class Action and Trustee of Capita Oak

Dear Langar (Christopher Payne) will you kindly ask "Poker Bill" (Bill Perkins) to contact me.  I would like to discuss Georgina.  Most of the Class Action's efforts are concentrated on rescuing the victims and assets after the event - this time I would like to see if financial ruin can be avoided before this new scam even gets off the ground.  Prevention is better than cure after all, and I am sure that all the Capita Oak members (plus victims of all the other scams) would agree with me.