01516680386

Report a phone call from 01516680386 and help to identify who and why is calling from this number.
  • 0
    Apart replies to Please be careful
    | 3 replies
    from the investors who could not contact anyone for ages.
  • 0
    Well replies to Apart
    | 2 replies
    I'm sure they've all been contacted by now. 54 complaints to action fraud, head in sand comes to mind. It was Payne who did the accounts during period in question. Dunlop's resignation took a 'few weeks to sort out' but still acted as Director till July
    He was paid by Hadley for his services, so you really should be directing questions at him, his whereabouts and current ventures are well advertised. Still bored and going round in circles !!!
  • 0
    Accounts replies to Well
    | 1 reply
    There were accounts? Why did no one see them?
  • 0
    Well replies to Accounts
    I stand corrected, he did the accounting services . If you think returns to companies house are wrong take it up with them.
  • 0
    I've replies to Duty vs Morals
    heard that Dunlop authorised/instructed the investment day of his appointment. Then submitted post dated resignation twice, but still carried on giving instructions whilst still being demanding 2k month for his services. He was paid by the ginger ninja, and is now still offering a 'pension service' with the guy. Trojan & Tpr.
  • 0
    Alzie replies to PLEASE BE CAREFUL
    | 6 replies
    Capital value means sweet FA to me. I can accept the fact that I will never see my money again, just do whatever I can to make life difficult for Mr TW and his Companies
  • 0
    Paul T replies to PLEASE BE CAREFUL
    Making reference to the backdated resignation
  • 0
    Paul T replies to Reasonable Question
    | 13 replies
    Depends on a lot of things to be honest...initially it was deemed to be  " deferred"...when Mr D got involved all the authorities were involved already.
    I think the person who was running that particular show knew exactly what the score was.
  • 0
    Reasonable Question replies to Paul T
    | 12 replies
    Deferred? The rent was paid or it was not. So the owner of Imperial was also the accountant and when he found the rent had been "deferred", why did he not alert the authorities to what Hadley and his cronies were up to?
  • 0
    Paul T replies to Reasonable Question
    | 11 replies
    The word deferred was used when initial questions were asked...the accountant was never an owner. As mentioned, authorities involved when accountant came in to attempt to unravel and has assisted the authorities ever since
  • 0
    Reasonable Question replies to Paul T
    | 10 replies
    Could you and "Well" get your story straight? "Well" seems to know about this, unlike you. He named the person that ran the accounts and according to Companies' House this is the same as the shareholder of Imperial. I just wanted to know why the authorities were not alerted by the owner and the accountant at the time the rent was "deferred". Why not refer to it as theft, as that is what it is? Surely, it would have helped bring this to a head a year early.
  • 0
    PLEASE BE CAREFUL replies to Reasonable Question
    | 2 replies
    The authorities started to investigate this scheme in early 2014 possibly late 2013  and very quickly new everything that had happened. Paul t is certainly well versed on this matter ,more than most .Look back on this site to say october 2014 and you will see all the names mentioned several times a day , none of these names are new i can assure you.
  • 0
    seems replies to PLEASE BE CAREFUL
    | 1 reply
    People are out to discredit Paul T again, happens when the crooks feel insecure.
    The investors were told that the rent had been deferred when they started asking questions, its as simple as that.  The theft was realised as the issue dragged on and the actual story came to light.
  • 0
    PLEASE BE CAREFUL replies to seems
    You are so correct ,that is why i keep saying that every member should bombard the official receivers office in manchester. In my opinion contacting store first is a waste of time  and effort.
  • 0
    Paul T replies to Reasonable Question
    | 6 replies
    Not wishing to sound arrogant...having been involved in this for 2 years...having been in court rooms when Imperial and Transeuro were wound up. .having been involved in scheme meetings with HMRC,Metis Law and the Insolvency service..and in constant contact with the media as things move forward, I think I am  rather accurate
  • 0
    PLEASE BE CAREFUL replies to Paul T
    | 5 replies
    Great paul !You also deserve an apology . What i would like to know is who are these people asking questions that were both asked and answered almost 2 years ago. Can anyone answer that.
  • 0
    Reasonable Question replies to PLEASE BE CAREFUL
    | 4 replies
    Well and Paul T seem to have a different opinion as to who was doing the management accounts. I just highlighted this issue and asked why the authorities were not contacted earlier, that is all.
    It seems to me that it was investor pressure that caused the authorities to act, not an altruistic act by the organisers of the scheme.
  • 0
    PLEASE BE CAREFUL replies to Reasonable Question
    You are so so wrong in fact you could not be more wrong.
  • 0
    PLEASE BE CAREFUL replies to Reasonable Question
    May I ask, are you a Capita Oak member or just asking questions?
  • 0
    Paul T replies to Reasonable Question
    | 1 reply
    To clarify...myself and we'll do not have a differencertain of opinions...I knew what he meant as he too  understands me

Submit a comment about 01516680386 phone number:

The company that called you.
 
Other phone numbers that starts with 015