01516680386

Forget ,she also posed as a barrister and had never been called to the bar .

Seem to remember she was telling people why would she be interested in capita oak for the money when she could be 'earning thousands as a barrister' . At least she seems to be restricted to twitter etc now, and that's full of tw@s

@JOHNcwILSON5 has an interesting story to tell..
@billrobinsonwhu @groupfirst Hi Rob, Toby Whittaker is scum as are all in management at this company. I am slandering him in the hope (forlorn) he will reply.

You should all check his feed:
https://twitter.com/johncwilson5/status/848577086176538630

Doesn't like it at him...When you have a go via twitter.

Type his name into Google.thats what sort of bloke he is

If you want to save 750 simply get your bank statement showing thurlstone to HMRC and get the correct figure back as a repayment amount. PPI has nothing on her

have just got my mail and was not surprised to find a letter addressed to me (obviously), from the Valuation Office Agency telling me of a appeal hearing between Store First and the Valuation Officer in the Valuation Tribunal for England.' Stay with Me'. The long and short of it is as follows , Store first are trying to get out of paying the RATES on each and every pod as they suggest that the owners of said pods should be liable for the Rates and not Store First. Simply put as i see it , They tried Covertly to get this passed, and failed, so as far as i see it are getting another Hearing to get this rather dubious and cruel move to squeeze yet even more cash out of the cheated investors imopo . I have been invited to the hearing because i have a valid interest in the case. The Date of the hearing is 7 June 2017.
If you are in some way involved in this debacle you have a right as a interested person to take part in proceedings.
If you have any questions with regards this case please write or email Mrs Elizabeth Mellors at, elizabeth.j.mellors@voa.gsi.gov.uk.
You may also be able to receive a copy of store first limited case against the valuation officers and the valuation officers response.
Please note that also  mentioned in the letter , that although they cannot themselves help in this case, you can get your own legal representative or a Rating surveyor if you wish to take this further.

You are the leaseholder of a property you are responsible for the rates ,not the freeholder.this is a battle they will not win.

the investor is leaseholder and is responsible, its in the T&Cs.
Though it states in the T&C's that SF believe it to be under current levels to attract rates  (2010) , but is reviewed every 5 years.
The gov still haven't resolved nearly 20% of 2010 appeals.

My deeds sate that Berkeley Burke are the leaseholders, and thats why I have not been allowed to place them into an Auction myself

Hiya Alzie, i am not sure if this will help you but could you email me on louicu2010@outlook.com ,

Banned as a director but not his wife who bought the claims for 3 and a half grand. 327 pensions bought 12 million quids worth of tin cans thanks to this guy.

And any investor would have leased back the pods to Storefirst Management Ltd for them to mismanage under a 6 year deal, So Storefirst Management would be liable for any rates you'd think.

Is 100 per cent certain .store first are liable but they will try to wriggle out of it but will not succeed.localauthorities rarely lose rate disputes.

Knew this was an issue years ago, that's why the 2 year break has been invoked. They know how slow the official bodies work and have used the appeal process to there advantage to suck in 'investors'. They'll just fold the company that's liable if they loose.

I posted this before but people ignore and don't even acknowledge it, reason why he's getting away with it!

When they realise the 'clever' wording of Storefirst T&c re leases and buy back is just a Ponzi Scheme, and they have also been denied income.
You'd think a buyers solicitor would know of this appeal when carrying out searches, it'll be Vat next !!! Authorities should have stopped him after Dylan Harvey

Don't ignore, it's the authorities who don't take full action same in the tw@ case.  He should have been stopped years ago and this would have never happened.

Did happen in the past so dear members make sure that it does now .

Been away for a while I guess there is no chance of getting  any of our money back