08443573311

Report a phone call from 08443573311 and help to identify who and why is calling from this number.
  • 0
    Eastway replies to Facts
    | 12 replies
    Still only looking at part of a post and ignoring the rest I see!? You have Google so I'm sure being as smart as you are you can find the numver for Cheshire trading standards and Merseyside Police. I realy do not understand your reluctance. I say call trading standards as there are claims of their wrongdoing and supposed investigations so surely it would be seen as fit to call and enquire. I did and all on this and other threads seem to be nonsense1

    nan, a person that does not get calls from alleged advertising companies would not be the second person to post a comment on the thread relating to that company and the sole purpose is to "expose" tapa.

    FACTS, you say I dodge the facts yet you still refuse to check my comments at source? Pot, kettle, black?

    I also enjoy being in the knowledge that business owners will read this and see your selective responses (in the sense you take part of my comments and reply, yet twist what I say to satisfy your crusade). Make the calls, I did and thats why I stand up for them as if I can see it works why should i let you get away with your fraud?

    With regards to your Free Index comment, I have checked the owner out, and that remark seems to make no sense. It is clear any positive info about (in your opinion) tapa must be from tapa or "stupid" people (yes, "stupid!" running a company). This includes solicitors, plumbers, schools and lets not forget the trading standards officers, police and reporters from national newspapers.

    "I love engaging with Eastway, Nan, he is the perfect example of the bungling scammer, always dodging the facts and incriminating himself. Long may it continue!"

    Incriminating in what way? Honest comments that can be checked? Get a grip!
  • 0
    Nan replies to Eastway
    | 6 replies
    Now who is only looking at part of the post.  You said that you had checked out advertising companies on this website and seen my posts.  I asked you for the 'phone numbers of those advertising companies.  If my post was the second post on there, you must know the number.  Do share.  It really is no good repeating the same old things and not supplying proof.
  • 0
    Eastway replies to Nan
    | 5 replies
    One of many:

    0161 2283900

    Seems others have their doubts about you! A thread is started about a bogus ad company and bam, there you are the very same day?!

    What is now being aledged on here is (my understanding anyway):

    1) I can not possibly be genuine as am happy with the tapa service.
    2) Any business that says they are happy are just morons who do not know their own mind.
    3) The Police have been fooled by them.
    4) Trading standards have been fooled by them.
    5) The national papers that have done articles have also been duped by them (bearing in mind 2 of them are investigative journalists).
    6) Tapa is behind any site with positive comments.
    7) Tapa scam people out of thousnads / tens of thousands just to give it back for £200 a year.
    8) This site is the only genuine one with genuine comments (haha).
    9) Despite the fact they have been going since 2007 according to this site have been closed multiple times.
    10) (not sure I can validate this so please feel free to dismiss it) They are the top branch of the Illuminati tree (how else could they possibly get away with so much for so long?).
    11) Despite any customer being able to contact their rep at any time (weekdays, weekends, evenings and holidays) they do nothing.
    12) Final question, If they are the ones who scammed all people who joined them why on earth do they talk people through the small claims process to get money back paid out months or years previous? Seems a bit strange to file a court claim against yourself?

    Nan, just Google whocallsme.com "nan" and you and all others will see how amazingly active you seem to be. There are many people on business and residential threads asking the same questions as me, why. It's almost as if you sit on this site all day every day for some reason?hmmmmm! There are so manythreads with you commenting yet time and time again you mention tps. Either tps is a massive massive failure for you as you seem to get every number ever used by sales companies call you and have for years, I do not understand why you champion them so much as evidently they do not work (your living proof, not my opinion you must understand). I would report tps and start a thread about them if I were you!

    Finally, you state on many threads this site is purely for scam warnings. The following text from this sites home page doesnt seem to suggest that is the case. Infact, it actually says as well as being for scam warnings you can type any number in and check comments. I do not and have not seen anywhere that states no positive comments:


    "Reverse Phone Number Lookup

    This is a user supplied database of phone numbers of telemarketers, non-profit organizations, charities, political surveyors, SCAM artists, and other companies that don't leave messages, disconnect once you answer, and simply interrupt your day.

    If you received a strange call, unwanted SMS message, or just came across a number you don't recognize and want more information about, most likely you are not the only one. Search for this phone number to see the reports of others. If there are no reports yet, leave your comment to start a conversation."

    Tell me this, why is it tapa plead with people to not post positive comments on the web (not just here) as they say it just invites the crooks to post more malicious posts to bury the good and advise word of mouth is best as that is not able to be twisted by the crooks?

    FACTS, I also observe you have made a number of incorrect accusations in the past on other threads. Merseyside police seem to be investigating a George Williams and are presenting evidence to the court for prosecution. The following thread seems to suggest the Police have got it wrong againL:

    https://whocallsme.com/Phone-Number.aspx/08455390159

    I'm sure theres more but I realy cant be bothered looking now. My work is done, I have given proof and said where i get my info for others to check so makes this thread a bit pointless. I'm not sure how many will bother to read after they read near the start of most threads tapa is under investigation but see years later they are still going. Kind of voids the thread as its an evident blag! I'm sure some info is true, much false and the rest just plain bizarre. There's so many plots and theories, alledged ex-employees and supposed current employees parading as genuine peiople and "genuine people" that blatantly look like a scam and overall it would make Hitchcock water at the mouth!

    Tut tut eh? You couldnt make this stuff up, it's more addictive viewing than an itv drama!

    Nonetheless, I have made my point, protested my satisfaction and have been subjected to ridicule, bullying and borderline abuse. Way to go, yeah, real trustworthy bunch!
  • 0
    Nan replies to Eastway
    | 4 replies
    You are slipping.  01612283900.  1st Post reporting a scam charity publishing company.  2nd Post Person stating he had reported the company to TAPA.  3rd Post Mine "With regard to charity publishing scams and TAPA you may wish to check out 08223573311".  With regard to whocallme.  my posts state "This site is to report unknown, unwanted and scam calls".  You have spent a lot of time spouting absolute rubbish  to try and justify your support of TAPA.  I am sure your masters will give you a bonus for your efforts.
  • 0
    Eastway replies to Nan
    | 3 replies
    Apologies, you are 3rd on a thread not 2nd. So, you have automatic alerts set up do you? How else could you possibly know? I think it's clear. I'm self employed as stated a few times previously so not sure of your "masters" remark. Are you saying you randomly found out about a thread on the same day it was created mentioning tapa? Google does not spider sites that quickly! Its obvious facts posts are done from an seo perspective as they look gobledygook to us mere mortals with low iq and zero literacy skills!

    Your post and what this sites very own homepage state are different though so are you now saying you make the rules? Your anger is making you slip up!

    "08223573311"?????? What? My "support"? If you read my posts it's clear tapa worked for me and many others so why not show a bit of support? From what I can tell your problem is you went to a site (tapa) for the 1st ever time, did'nt read any info, registered, got a bill then accused them of scamming? Fool! You can read (selectively yes but seemingly have basic skills in that area).

    What of the list of points in my previous post? No comment? What of the fact you can speak to the police and government and asa and cap (the latter 2 will clarify their site is compliant) yet have yet to report their responses to your questions.

    What of the countless others over the years that notice your constant posts? What of you championing tps yet it is impossible it is working for you? What of the fact I have backed all my comments up with verifiable sources?

    I'm not stupid, I understand the alegations about the alledged owner /  s but my arguement is that it works and it defies all logic the accusations about their intentions. It's screaming people in the face that it works and you do such a good job in your crusade you probably convince perfectly satisfied customers they are stupid and are being conned. I fail to see how I am though?! Calls stopped, money back, 24 / 7 support by phone, email, fax and post. Business owners who are willing to testify they have had representation in court (yeah, not as a solicitor but mackenzie friend or something like that) and won. How do you explain all of that work and effort they put in and the results of it? Your claims make no sense so damn straight I will put my case across. If that makes small minded people think its only possible tapa can do that then thats your insecurities or intentional fraud and deceptive nature.

    You leave so many questions unanswered it's too much for people to believe hence my accusations you are not (as one poster on an unrelated thread put it) the "superhero with your gold cape" you try to make out!! There are many, many threads questioning why you post so often and it's begs the question, is it a major coincidence? Maybe you are just a busy body stirring up trouble and thrive off drama, maybe you are not and are paid to bulk up threads, only your conscience (mqaybe you have 1) knows!

    Goodbyeeee!
  • 0
    Chuckle replies to Kavanaghs2fit
    I recall my bank balance falling a lot faster than the calls ever did when I was mugged by TAPA!
    Reading here it was probably because the TAPA partner who was done for fraud was processing the TAPA debit card subscriptions. Bet they're all crooks! Wish I'd known about TAPA before they contacted me. Still I was only ensnared for 2 months so got off lightly and had the bank block their debits which made them go ape! I just ignored them and they gave up. Still, gave me a chuckle when I saw the TAPA scam was still running - must be some real mugs out there who haven't seen the warnings!
  • 0
    Chuckle replies to Eastway
    You sound rattled pal - truth hurting? Bloody classic coming on here and seeing the TAPA racket is out in the open lol! Court cases the lot! Made my afternoon seeing it's been exposed for what it is. Love it!
  • 0
    Nan replies to Eastway
    I seem to have got under your skin.  The post mentioning TAPA was on the same day as my answer.  I saw the name TAPA and, considering the disgusting way it had dealt with individuals (you note I do not say businesses) I posted the link to this thread. People could follow it or not as they pleased. I pointed out some time ago that when I found out that TAPA were no longer conning individuals, it was no longer of interest to me.  If you think it is wrong to tell people about scams and point them in the direction they may wish to go to avoid them, then you are the loser.  It is a pity you have to resort to abuse to try and win your pathetic little argument, but you seem to want to lash out at anyone who disagrees with your version of events.
  • 0
    John
    Well said Nan. Eastway is just so obvious. I think he thinks if he can get the last word in people won't go back and look through all 43 pages of this thread and get to see what they are really like.
  • 0
    Facts replies to Eastway
    | 4 replies
    Another bungling reply to wade through. Yet again devoid of any factual references or links to substantiate anything you claim. I shall humour you when I have had a beer. I note that your spelling is a sloppy as your analysis. Rock on Eastway ;-)
  • 0
    Facts replies to Eastway
    Don't go - I love comedians! Please come back!
  • 0
    Eastway replies to Facts
    | 3 replies
    Erm. . . . .  So, the fact I provided the thread details, what police force, what trading standards office etc that you can check my comments goes un-noticed yet again? Why?

    My spelling is "sloppy" due to my dyslexia as previously stated (and I was ridiculed for that also!). All can see the links, numbers and details where to check my comments so why keep claiming I have not provided them?

    I have asked so many questions that are ignored I'm just wondering why? I'm sure others are too!! The only reply I get is accusations?!?!

    Also funny that so many ex unhappy clients of tapa crawl out of the woodwork when positive comments are put on here?!

    FACTS, I'm not sure if I'm allowed to name specific officers / numbers at trading standards or the police but if you explain why you calling them they seem to know who best you speak with:-) . You can Google the details and just call, I did.

    So, tell me, is it normal for trustworthy sources to sit up at 4am (assuming you are in the UK of course) drinking and abusing people?
  • 0
    Facts replies to Eastway
    More whining devoid of any substantiated data. Keep it up ;-)
  • 0
    Alan replies to Eastway
    | 1 reply
    Tony you plonker! You mean it's funny that so many TAPA stooges crawl out of the woodwork when the truth about the TAPA scam or any scam support publisher is posted up on here! Bricking yourself because the scam cash coming in is slowing down? Associates grassing you up again because you can't pay them off?
  • 0
    Eastway replies to Alan
    Ermm, ok?!

    Really, you win, I will leave this thread. My job is done. People can see how insane it is and I am doubtful any attention will be paid to it. The more if's, but's, maybe's and conspiracy theories there are the more likely people will just call Trading Standards and the Police (like I did) and be satisfied they are doing as they say. Even ASA say their site is cap code compliant and has been for over a year (remember, they had 6 complaits to ASA).

    "stooges", "scammers" and down right loons I bid you farewell (for good this time, it is far too 007 now!ha!).

    P.S. Alan, have you not heard from the other thread? They were all arrested and shut down at tapa months ago?!hahahaha!
  • 0
    TAPA Employee
    | 7 replies
    You people have been posting in here for 2 years.

    How very, very sad.
  • 0
    Nan replies to TAPA Employee
    No use changing your name, Eastway.
  • 0
    Facts replies to TAPA Employee
    Simister the fraudster and his TAPA partners have been active on www.whocallsme.com since it's launch. OK, not very successfully, but longer than 2 years.
  • 0
    mrs joan mccrudden replies to ha ha funny,
    i do not wish to renew my subscription to your call barring serving
                                      regards joan mccrudden
  • 0
    Facts replies to Facts
    | 4 replies
    Security alert - Anthony Michael Simister and associates scam sites

    The address given on the www.nuisancecalls.org.uk scam site, The Nuisance Calls Forum
    has been switched from

    The Nuisance Calls Forum
    Highfield House
    Congleton Road
    Stoke On Trent
    ST7 3SY

    To:

    The Nuisance Calls Forum
    The Studio
    55 Weir Road
    London
    SW19 8UG

    enquiries@nuisancecalls.org.uk
    www.nuisancecalls.org.uk

    Domain name:
          nuisancecalls.org.uk

      Registrant:
          mr peter marsden

      Registrant type:
          UK Individual

      Registrant's address:
          102 stand lane
          radcliffe
          radcliffe
          M26 1JU
          United Kingdom

      Registrar:
          34SP.com Limited [Tag = 34SP]
          URL: http://www.34sp.com 

      Relevant dates:
          Registered on: 22-Jun-2011
          Expiry date:  22-Jun-2013
          Last updated:  27-Sep-2012

      Registration status:
          Registered until expiry date.

      Name servers:
          ns77.domaincontrol.com
          ns78.domaincontrol.com

Submit a comment about 08443573311 phone number:

The company that called you.
 
Other phone numbers that starts with 084