08702202020

"Your poor wife must have been sick with worry after a diagnosis like that"

The husband could register www.opticalexpressruinedmywife.com

I think the e-petition is the least of your worries

BMCOE replies to Anon (the original)
49 min ago
I think the e-petition is the least of your worries
____________________________________________________________

Thanks for your concern.  My only worry was getting my tax form in on time.  No longer a worry.

You are right in saying that nothing has changed - the industry wide campaign has been dead since Sasha sold out to Optimax. OERML is just for Sasha's amusement.  She volunteered to smear Optical Express when negotiating her settlement with Optimax.  RA didn't even need to offer any extra.

Before Wondering tries to accuse me of working for Optical Express, I would have no objection to OE being smeared, as long as Optimax got their fair share as well.


@Wondering
The Gullible and venal woman, who "apparently" applied for horizontal promotion and failed the interview.

If you have a message for Moulsdale, tell him personally, don't be a coward.  You claimed to know him, to have witnessed the multiple bedroom scenario and said that you had thought him to be a "good person" beforehand (your post of 21st August 2012) .  Now you've backed off  and attributed the allegation to someone else (Ex).  Make your mind up.  Did you witness it or not?

Wait for the next stage of Keogh, scheduled for Easter.  I may even send you an autographed copy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUfzAK0XmEc&noredirect=1all as bad!

1> "Just been told today out store is closing! Got some b*s**t about it not being anything to worry about and they'd try to move us to other stores. I hope this company rots in hell. They treat people like used oily rags and the guy they sent to do it with some woman from Hr seemed as genuine as fake gold and as concerned as used car salesman who's just scammed yet another poor mug. I ain't going down without a fight! Optical express is going to the dogs and I say about time! Sad pathetic tossers. Watch out ex colleagues to be... You could be next!!"

2> "Gold" ???

3>  http://www.monsterpriceforgold.com/happy-customers.aspx

"David Moulsdale - 19/11/09
I sent off some gold and silver to MonsterPriceForGold and received a phone call the next day from Mat I expected that I might get £200 but was delighted to hear that I would get £810 I would not hesitate to recommend using them."

Please post your experiences on

www.opticalexpressruinedmylife.co.uk

My experience with Optical Express is entirely positive. Will this be allowed on that site?

My experience of optical express is entirely negative.
I do not think I have  heard anyone say one good thing about this company.

@Isaiah
the website is a grudge site.  Balanced opinions are probably not welcome.  Try it and see.  let us know what happens.

Are you talking about opticalexpressruinedmylife .co.uk?

Do you mean how optical Express are allegedly trying to control their Wikipedia page ?


Didnt someone write on this forum saying that optical Express have been removing negative feedback about optical express from many websites ?

Wondering replies to Adviser
15 min ago
Are you talking about opticalexpressruinedmylife.co.uk?
_____________________________________________________

Yes - I am specifically talking about opticalexpressruinedmylife.co.uk and NOT Optical Express the company.

There are lots of allegations on this site.  Very few substantiated.  For instance, didn't someone allege on this forum that you were a fantasist and paranoid?

However, it is a fact that opticalexpressruinedmylife.co.uk is a grudge site and therefore may be presumed to dislike/censor posts which counter the raison d'etere of the site.

http://www.cqc.org.uk/search/apachesolr_searc ... &deregistered=0

Quality Care Commission;

We are currently reviewing one or more government standards at this location

Liverpool 1.  

That comes as no surprise.

Doesn't OERML have a story regarding hairs on the equipment at time of surgery, think I recall something along those lines somewhere.

If it gets shut down, at the very least it will save a few peoples eye sight.

Hi Nick,
I see that you haven't seen through Sasha yet.  She can be plausible, but eventually her true colours will out.

> "With your e-petition stalled, your MP more concerned with gay marriage than regulation of eye surgery, you would know all about dying embers."

> ?

> http://www.scotsgay.co.uk/text/sg59.txt

"David Moulsdale, millionaire owner of Optical Express, Health Clinic, Specialeyes and Co-Op Eyecare in the UK is planning to use the Netherlands as a testing ground for rapid expansion into Europe. Moulsdale, chairman of DCM Holdings, backed religious militant Brian Souter's massive 'Keep the Clause' campaign, sponsoring a private referendum to prevent the repeal of a law introduced into Scotland by Margaret Thatcher's Conservative Government forcing gays to be treated differently in schools. Clause 28 forced local authorities not to 'promote' homosexuality and forbade schools to teach the acceptability of homosexuality as a 'pretended family relationship'. The law was eventually repealed, first in Scotland, and then in the rest of the UK. To promote his company, David Moulsdale uses Jack Irvine's PR company Media House. Irvine masterminded the 'Keep the Clause' campaign for Stagecoach millionaire, Brian Souter. As a former tabloid editor and columnist, Irvine wrote in Scottish editions of The Daily Mirror during the campaign to equalise the age of consent in the UK: "A pretty young boy of 16 can't vote for his local MP, but he can now be buggered by him... So equality is the key, is it? In that case, shouldn't 16-year-olds get the vote, be eligible to become, say, policemen? No? Why not? Because they're not mature enough. But they
are deemed mature enough to be bum chums for sleazy old pervs". David Mousdale has now bought two eye laser clinics from Free Vision Euro Eyes, one in Amsterdam and the other in The Hague."

@She can be plausible, but eventually her true colours will out.

I hope so!

@the imposter posing as me

"Anon (the original) replies to wondering
31 min ago
Well I am just going to have to make love to myself; nobody seems to love me on here.

Why can't you all take me seriously for a change?

You'll be so sorry if I storm off in a huff!"
______________________________________________________

The fact that you post under my nickname merely exposes the fact that you nothing of substance to say for yourself.

Me, "storm off in a huff"?  Wishful thinking on your part.  I'm here for the duration.  Get used to it.  No amount of spamming by wondering, attempted shifting of blame or false accusations of being an OE employee will work.


@One Eye
Your posting of an extract from a 2004 article is supposed to prove what?  That Moulsdale was against promotion of homosexuality?  Many people, whilst not discriminating against homosexuality, would not want it "promoted" to children.  Acceptance yes, promotion, no.

A recent poster 'Marion' wrote this post on whocallsme with reference to optical express

'The company is a discrace and truly lowest of the low and the dirty sleezy drug fuelled Hugh Kerr and David moulesdale are to blame for the life's they have ruined over the years ! '

@Wondering
So Marion said.  But you've omitted to say that she was obviously little more than a call centre operator or "advisor" with no apparent knowledge outside her area. Otherwise she would have known that it's the CQC, not the NHS who are responsible for audit.  Her literacy is also a (low) par with that of Wondering.

She was more concerned with money than the lives which she admits helping to ruin.  Hardly a good example to quote.

You seem to be a very clever and knowledgeable man Mr Anon & I'm interested in hearing more as you know so much about everyone who posts here even though they use aliases.

Please tell me how you know Marion was more concerned with money than the lives which she admits helping to ruin?  (Please can you tell me which page that is on so I can read the awful woman's admission of guilt!)

Why is it obvious she was little more than a call operator?

If so, how did she help ruin people's lives?

@ Anon's fan

All rather trivial; I just happen to possess a superior knowledge on these matters. My analytical skills and intellect may be intrinsically hindered by my vanity, but pleases do not be fooled. I have an enormous ability to visualize, articulate, and solve both complex and stupidly easy problems and concepts and make decisions for us all. To emphasis this I am underlining my reply to you while I spend a few hours rooting through all 100 pages (my pages) and watching re-runs of Crossroads on my OE DVD player.
________________________________________________________________________________