01733553001

Received 36 email from you lot in 24 hours. For the last time sort out your bloody unsubscribe process. No point having an unsubscribe link if it doesn't work!

Hahaha - "Given the fact that it's due to you and your campaigning and he's forgotten that the only reason Corbin and McDonnell won the election was due largely to you."

Wow, talk about delusions of grandeur - get back in your box and face it; you've been used for a cheap vote - now you're on the bad end of broken promises. Don't feel bad - it's just politics.

To further your campaign; buy me a pint and I'll scribe 'laser eye surgery sux' on a bus window. But I won't mention what you'll have to do to get me to say it on the radio ;)

Why don't you review an Optimax employee review?

http://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/Optimax-Lase ... ews-E767907.htm

Worked as an intern probably for free more than 1 year in kuala lumpur and have learnt nothing. What was the point?

http://bit.ly/1XHAFYq

They won't have any employees left as they are allegedly going bankrupt. The staff would be better leaving now so that they still get paid their December/Christmas wage.

Optimax are going down faster than Dani Behr at a footballers Christmas party.

Last person to leave, remember to turn off the Schwind device. Or should that be Swindle, depending on whether you are an aftercare patient or not?

Optimax are not far away from insolvency but no wonder. They seem to have more court cases than treatments this year:

http://www.irwinmitchell.com/client-stories/2 ... ry-compensation

Sarah Rowland, one of our associate solicitors, won £90,000 in compensation for a client who underwent Lasik laser eye surgery, although it was later discovered he was not a suitable candidate for surgery.

In September 2001 the client went to the Optimax Clinic in London for an assessment of suitability for laser eye surgery. During this assessment our client informed the ophthalmologist that he had been refused laser treatment in South Africa due to the uneven surface of his cornea. He understood that the improvement in technology might have changed his suitability for treatment.

The ophthalmologist took Orbscan readings (which mark the contours of the cornea). These readings were clearly abnormal and should have led to a diagnosis of an irregular astigmatism due to either sub-critical pellucid marginal degeneration or forme fruste keratoconus; both of which are absolute contraindications to laser treatment.

Nevertheless, the ophthalmologist told our client that he was a suitable candidate for laser treatment which was duly carried out in October 2001.
Within a few months there had been an increase in the degree of the irregular shape of the cornea in both eyes and there was a marked deterioration in his vision. He underwent INTACS implantation in March 2004 but this failed to result in an improvement.

Our client was employed in a computer-based job and was unable to continue to work and without further surgery it was likely that his vision would continue to deteriorate further.
The ophthalmologist admitted that our client was not a suitable candidate for laser surgery and agreed to compensate him for the injuries caused by the treatment.

Sarah Rowland, said "As laser eye surgery becomes more popular we are seeing more examples of people suffering injuries which could have been avoided. As this example demonstrates, it is important that all ophthalmologists who provide these services are fully aware of the risks and consider very carefully whether the patient is a suitable candidate."

Optimax could go under any day now

There is a distance of roughly 7,223 miles between Lyon, France and Santiago, Chile.

Make of that what you will.

How FUCKlNG dare you, you pompous arrogant twot.

If only you knew the pain of surgery not going well and to have excruciatingly painful dry eyes every night you might be a little bit more a human rather than toilet slime!!!

Of course it's obviously you are on the Optimax payroll. Are you Russell. Caught.

Sticks and stones. Truth hurts and you've clearly been hurt more by the truth than you have by any laser. Just out of interest, how much money is there in case referrals? Might  have to get in on the game.

Where this info comes from?

Official reports provided by Nominet show that they earn at least £6,000 per year in advertising royality fees from the My Beautiful Eye website. That's publically declared income from last year's report.

Hezbollah, Al Qaeda, PIRA and Islamic State are funded by unidentified anonymous sources in a similar way but chances of these extremist militants revealing the true sources & donation amounts to their campaign are as slim as getting an honest answer from this lot but you could always make a Freedom of Information act to their official spokesperson, or this John McDonnell character.

Greetings traveller! My name is Falconhoof and I will be your guide in your quest to find a new adventure. Would you like to jump the chasm?

OE seems to be tireless in recruiting Optimax employees

Who would want to hire Optimax employees? People like Dr Wilbert Hoe who on 18th February 2011 damaged a patients eyes for life?

Well on that fateful Winter day all those years ago, he and they will both wish he had called in sick as it wasn't any old patient that was damaged that day, but a great prophet who is now become death, the destroyer of worlds.

Tick tock ;-)

It comes from evil, twisted people who libel companies to try and put hard working employees out of work. They should feel ashamed with themselves. *tuts and shakes head disapprovingly*

But hey what would I know - I'm just an innocent passer by.

http://www.opticianonline.net/ten-optimax-clinics-risk-closure/

This is only the beginning. Up to 200 donkeys getting released. On the brightside, at least McDonalds & Burger King will have some new people to interview for burger flipper roles.

I misread your note at first.    Thought the donkeys were to be used as ingredients.      My apologies.

and Optimax employees are being tired to be Optimax employees