02071275255

Stay tuned we will keep u aBREAST of any further BS rumours about ken and his staff

Yes, the Mirror is planning a major piece

pure logic i would be very interested in photos of them all if you can find away of getting them to me, thanks.

If any person has paid or part paid on a credit card as a deposit or in full on a credit card and found out you have been miss sold  I.e. scammed then put a charge back on your cr3dit card . Not just for the deposit but for the full amount.then the will refund you. Its clause 75 of your credit card agreement.

It was in the Daily mirror a week or two back. Some guy did this and got a full refund. And I belive the credit cRd firm will go after the culprits  for there money. What have you got to loose.

Be it any firm or scam investement, wine, diamonds, land, any thing.

even if you done a deal for 5k and paid £100.00 or less claim for the full amount you will  be surprised its a fact.

so if you paid a deposit on credit card and paid the rest on what ever bank transfer or cheque

put a charge back on the company

you have 6 years do do this from when you found out it was a scam

anon WHO USED TO WORK THERE that's a typical response from the kind of nob head that used to work there ,i think its all you employees that need to get used to being BUM MEN i be leave there's lots of people interested in that sort of thing in PRISON were most of you will be going .get used to it bro because that's ware your all going to end up penniless by the time people have finished with you all ,enjoy your freedom while it lasts      

Has anyone added anything productive? This thread is turning into a diary of disrepute, either add some valuable information or just read the thread, this whole thing is already turning into a circus.  

Ken won't go to prison - Fact!!

He'll get banned as a director and will more then likely have a fine imposed on him and a charge against his assets, nothing more nothing less.

The closers will be left alone  - Fact!!

The law doesn't work on intention when it comes to business, the investors are better off putting together a worthless civil case against this lot, which will get nowhere but may cost them some money.

I've lost money in this scheme which I know I won't get back, but I'm not stupid enough to throw good money after bad. As the 26th draws near I urge you to manage your expectations.

Good Luck!!  

MIDNIGHT1... you worked with us too you nob.. otherwise how on earth would you have photos of anyone????
pot and kettle spring to mind.
you are exactly the type of plonker who has posted loads of BS on here getting clients and journalists all hyped and gas about a story that doesnt exist!!

midnight1 you can't spell at all... That lack of education explains your position at BFW... FIRED.. Another failed broker turned gossip mongerer.

Don't worry, there really aren't any journalists here. Do you really think your company is interesting enough to be featured?

Guys, there really is a lot of people who have disrespected the real losers of this scam.
Nobody forced anyone at gunpoint to invest, so if people have paid over the current market value they should of checked the price, BFW are being wound up for a nearly £900K unpaid tax-debt, it is a civil case not a criminal case.
If someone presses criminal charges and can prove that wine has been sold by the brokerage (BFW) that the brokerage wasn't purchasing - then that is fraud plain and simple and for that the guilty individual(s) will be legally punished, the brokers can't be prosecuted as they will automatically blame their purchasing dept for not buying the asset, as there is one director the responsibility will stop with them.
Is there criminal charges underway yet ?
Normally an investor group is formed and a fund will need to be contributed to which will pay their solicitor/barrister fees, without this it can't be brought to court and if a court doesn't find Mr Gundlach and co guilty - he walks away Scott-free apart from the director ban etc etc that the HMRC will punish him with.
If I was Mr Gundlach I would be more worried of gangsters than the High Court.

anonwhousedtoworkthere and anon read the posts ,why would i be wanting pictures if i worked there ???? im afraid your panicking now boys ,im defiantly not a ex employee i have nothing to worry about ,i can sleep at night knowing ive not ripped people of .CAN YOU      

17 January 2014


Edwin Coe steps in for consumers regarding Bordeaux Fine Wines Limited

The Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform, formerly the Department for Trade and Industry, has issued proceedings against Bordeaux Fine Wines Ltd with a view to compulsory liquidation. An order was made on 19 December 2013 by the court on presentation of the petition for interim insolvency and a provisional liquidator has been appointed.

The Croydon-based firm sold wines from Bordeaux and other fine wine producing regions by cold-calling potential investors.

"The Official Receiver has been appointed provisional liquidator of Bordeaux Fine Wines," read a statement from the Insolvency Service. "The role of the provisional liquidator is to protect assets in the possession or under the control of the company pending the determination of the petition.

"The provisional liquidator also has the power to investigate the affairs of the company insofar as it is necessary to protect the assets including any third party or trust money or assets in the possession or under the control of the company," it added.

The return date of the petition is 26 February 2014 and in the meantime those who have bought wine from Bordeaux Fine Wines Ltd are left wondering what has happened to their wine. Edwin Coe has been approached by creditors to represent and protect their interests.

Edwin Coe is a leader in the field of action groups and has an established track-record and an acknowledged reputation for pursuing such claims for consumers. We are ranked leaders in this field in the Legal 500 and Chambers (UK) directories, and received an award from 'The Lawyer' for outstanding achievement in our representation of action groups.

If you purchased wine from Bordeaux Fine Wines Ltd, which they were holding for you, whether in bond or not, please contact Edwin Coe using the details below.

ENDS

For further information on this news release, please contact:

David Greene, Senior Partner +44 (0)20 7691 4000 david.greene@edwincoe.com

Barbara Gregoriou, Business Development Manager +44 (0)20 7691 4173 barbara.gregoriou@edwincoe.com

thats is a nice Link aswell: http://www.gomopa.net/Pressemitteilungen.html?id=1358

To those posting messages here on behalf of the solicitors firm Edwin Coe LLP, please note that there are no “consumers”, no “clients”, no “customers” and no “investors” vis-a-vis Bordeaux Fine Wines Ltd. There are only VICTIMS.... of fraud and theft on a massive scale.

With due respect for the victims, please now post your assurances here, as well as on your own website, that neither Edwin Coe LLP nor its associates has any connection with Bordeaux Fine Wines Ltd or with anybody who worked for Bordeaux Fine Wines Ltd or any of its associated companies.

Please confirm that Edwin Coe LLP has no commercial connection with insolvency practitioners Nedim Patrick Ailyan (Abbott Fielding Ltd) or with David Ingram and Grant Thornton UK LLP that may give rise to a conflict of interest.

Please also confirm that Edwin Coe LLP does not act for any of the following persons or for any companies associated with them:

Kenneth Jean Pierre Gundlach,
Kim Sharlane Gundlach,
Alex James Whipps,
Deji Uthman,
Michael Joseph Solle,
Simon Daniel Clark,
Ryan Brown,
Matthew James Collier,
Leslie Arnold Geeraerts,
Brian Downs,
The HHC Partnership.

Naturally, if you are acting in good faith and with due confidence in your own expertise, you will promise that you will represent victims of Bordeaux Fine Wines Ltd on a no win no fee basis.

Thanks Anon,
It seems all is in hand, yesterday I spent a couple of hours reading every post on this thread, my conclusion is that this Mr Gundlach is an extremely sharp individual who generated an animal of a company that turned over £56M in 5 years !!! - astonishing !!! if Edwin Coe can prove the fraud (no doubt they will), the system needs to make an example of this case so that future want-to-be fraudsters shake in their boots at the penalties handed out.
Unfortunately for the creditors you can't get blood out of a stone - no doubt on paper he's now penniless

Look up Deji uthman aka ( alpha ) u won't believe the company names on directorships this guys made millions from bfw not hard to link company's . I suspect all other names on list are directors of shadow company's .

This is all too much. It's hard to know what to believe when reading this blog!!

1) type in full name against directors in uk                2) read history , company names                       3) business names will relate to investments, trading , wine etc                                                4) you or the investigators can trace where the money has gone                                            The names refered to are key staff in this company the reason they were not employed by bfw is purely for tax reasons ie ni , income tax for company and employee . By each broker having there own company mean much less tax on there massive earnings but by being a limited company it means there records , profits can easily be looked into by the guys who are doing the mirror article it will help piece together true earnings of not only gundlach but the brokers who worked with him to achieve 56 million .

Can someone tell me which court Ken is at today? And maybe a brief description of what he looks like. Thank you

jim budd reported already http://investdrinks-blog.blogspot.co.uk/searc ... &max-results=10